Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Nov;29(11):3194-3200.
doi: 10.1007/s43032-021-00817-7. Epub 2021 Dec 14.

Cumulus Cell DNA Damage as an Index of Human Oocyte Competence

Affiliations

Cumulus Cell DNA Damage as an Index of Human Oocyte Competence

Alejandro Baratas et al. Reprod Sci. 2022 Nov.

Abstract

The determination of oocyte quality is crucial for achieving effective syngamy post-sperm injection and embryonic development. Cumulus cells (CCs) have been proposed as biomarkers of oocyte quality because of their close bio-dynamic relationship with the oocyte. To determine the quality of the oocyte, CCs were sampled during oocyte preparation for ICSI to determine a CC DNA fragmentation index (CCDFI) of each individual oocyte using a variant of the chromatin dispersion test. One hundred and thirty oocytes were selected and studied from two Spanish fertility clinics, 90 of which were fertilized and developed to embryos. Significant differences were found between the CCDFI of unfertilized and fertilized oocytes (p < .001) and between the CCDFI of embryos that were discarded and those that developed suitable for transfer or cryopreservation (p < .001). Oocyte quality was negatively correlated with CCDFI (Spearman's rho = - 0.45; p < .001). Receiver operator characteristics curves (ROC) suggested that a cut-off value of 24% CCDFI was able to discriminate the capacity of the gametes to result in syngamy with a sensitivity and specificity of 75.6% and 65%, respectively. This cut-off supports the application of CCDFI as potential index for the evaluation of the reproductive potential of oocytes prior to fertilization.

Keywords: Biomarker; Cumulus cells (CCs); DNA fragmentation; Embryo quality; IVF/ICSI; Oocyte quality.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Visualization of DNA fragmentation in CCs using the chromatin dispersion assay
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Box-Whisker plots of the CCDFI with respective to (A) increasing levels of oocyte quality (B) embryos rejected by the embryologist (REJ) and those incubated for 3–5 days (EMB) before transfer and (C) grade quality of the embryos produced based in morphological parameters
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Green line ROC curve shows the ability of CCDFI to predict fertilized oocytes (FEO) and those that were not fertilized (NOI + UFO; AUC, .769; 95% CI [0.68–0.86]; SE, 0.046; p < .001). Blue line ROC shows the ability of CCDFI to predict embryos that were rejected by the embryologist (REJ) and those that were suitable for transfer and/or cryopreservation (AUC, .775; 95% CI [0.68–0.87]; SE, 0.048; p = .001). Red line ROC shows the ability of CCDFI to predict embryos reaching 3–5 days of development (AUC, 0.808; 95% CI [0.74–0.88]; SE, 0.037; p < .001)

References

    1. Serhal PF, Ranieri DM, Kinis A, Marchant S, Davies M, Khadum IM. Oocyte morphology predicts outcome of intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Hum Reprod. 1997;12:1267–1270. doi: 10.1093/humrep/12.6.1267. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Balaban B, Urman B, Sertac A, Alatas C, Aksoy S, Mercan R. Oocyte morphology does not affect fertilization rate, embryo quality and implantation rate after intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Hum Reprod. 1998;13:3431–3433. doi: 10.1093/humrep/13.12.3431. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zhang K, Smith GW. Maternal control of early embryogenesis in mammals. Reprod Fertil Dev. 2015;27:880–896. doi: 10.1071/RD14441. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wathlet S, Adriaenssens T, Segers I, Verheyen G, Janssens R, Coucke W, Devroey P, Smitz J. New candidate genes to predict pregnancy outcome in single embryo transfer cycles when using cumulus cell gene expression. Fertil Steril. 2012;98:432–439.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.05.007. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Russell DL, Robker RL. Cumulus cells. In: Michael K.Skinner (ed) Encyclopedia of reproduction, vol.2, 2nd ed.Boston: Academic Press; 2018:43–46

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources