Real models: The limits of behavioural evidence for understanding the ANS
- PMID: 34907874
- DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X21001151
Real models: The limits of behavioural evidence for understanding the ANS
Abstract
Clarke and Beck use behavioural evidence to argue that (1) approximate ratio computations are sufficient for claiming that the approximate number system (ANS) represents the rationals, and (2) the ANS does not represent the reals. We argue that pure behaviour is a poor litmus test for this problem, and that we should trust the psychophysical models that place ANS representations within the reals.
Comment in
-
Numbers, numerosities, and new directions.Behav Brain Sci. 2021 Dec 15;44:e205. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X21001503. Behav Brain Sci. 2021. PMID: 34907882
Comment on
-
The number sense represents (rational) numbers.Behav Brain Sci. 2021 Apr 12;44:e178. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X21000571. Behav Brain Sci. 2021. PMID: 33843510
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
