Positing numerosities may be metaphysically extravagant; positing representation of numerosities is not
- PMID: 34907885
- DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X21001126
Positing numerosities may be metaphysically extravagant; positing representation of numerosities is not
Abstract
Clarke and Beck (C&B) assume that approximate number system (ANS) representations should be assigned referents from our scientific ontology. However, many representations, both in perception and cognition, do not straightforwardly refer to such entities. If we reject C&B's assumption, many possible contents for ANS representations besides number are compatible with the evidence C&B cite.
Comment in
-
Numbers, numerosities, and new directions.Behav Brain Sci. 2021 Dec 15;44:e205. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X21001503. Behav Brain Sci. 2021. PMID: 34907882
Comment on
-
The number sense represents (rational) numbers.Behav Brain Sci. 2021 Apr 12;44:e178. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X21000571. Behav Brain Sci. 2021. PMID: 33843510
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
