Predatory Publishing Practices
- PMID: 34907933
- DOI: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000001275
Predatory Publishing Practices
Abstract
With open access publishing surging in popularity, it has provided an opportunity for entities to take advantage of the unique business model. Known as predatory journals, these entities accept a large fee in exchange for publication, but do not maintain any form of standards or peer review. This article aims to introduce the history and rise of predatory journals in hopes to further raise awareness and limit their spread.
Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
-
- Vakil C. Predatory journals. Can Fam Physician. 2019;65:92–94.
-
- Bagues M, Sylos-Labini M, Zinovyeva N. A walk on the wild side: “Predatory” journals and information asymmetries in scientific evaluations. Res Policy. 2019;48:462–477.
-
- Xia J, Harmon JL, Connolly KG, et al. Who publishes in “predatory” journals?. J Assoc Information Sci Technol. 2015;66:1406–1417.
-
- Grudniewicz A, Moher D, Cobey KD, et al. Predatory journals: no definition, no defence. Nature. 2019;576:210–212.
-
- Shen C, Björk B-C. “Predatory” open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics. BMC Med. 2015;13:230–245.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
