Influence of facility volume and type on esthesioneuroblastoma treatment and outcomes

Affiliations

¹ Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, Irvine, Orange, CA.
² Medical Scientist Training Program, University of Pittsburgh and Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA.
³ Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, Irvine, Orange, CA.

Khodayar Goshtasbi et al. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2022 Aug.

. 2022 Aug;12(8):1056-1059.

doi: 10.1002/alr.22948. Epub 2022 Jan 5.

¹ Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, Irvine, Orange, CA.
² Medical Scientist Training Program, University of Pittsburgh and Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA.
³ Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, Irvine, Orange, CA.

No abstract available

Keywords: esthesioneuroblastoma; facility volume; hospital volume; olfactory neuroblastoma; overall survival.

References

1. Fiani B, Quadri SA, Cathel A, et al. Esthesioneuroblastoma: a comprehensive review of diagnosis, management, and current treatment options. World Neurosurg. 2019;126:194-211.
1. Bradley PJ, Jones NS, Robertson I. Diagnosis and management of esthesioneuroblastoma. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2003;11:112-118.
1. Woods RSR, Subramaniam T, Leader M, McConn-Walsh R, O'Neill JP, Lacy PD. Changing trends in the management of esthesioneuroblastoma: Irish and international perspectives. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base. 2018;79:262-268.
1. Konuthula N, Iloreta AM, Miles B, et al. Prognostic significance of Kadish staging in esthesioneuroblastoma: an analysis of the National Cancer Database. Head Neck. 2017;39:1962-1968.
1. Chowdhury MM, Dagash H, Pierro A. A systematic review of the impact of volume of surgery and specialization on patient outcome. Br J Surg. 2007;94:145-161.