Efficacy of the Cooperative Assessment Method (COOPAS) to Improve the Psychiatric Care of Help-Seeking Adolescents
- PMID: 34908955
- PMCID: PMC8650201
- DOI: 10.36131/clinicalnpsych2019050601
Efficacy of the Cooperative Assessment Method (COOPAS) to Improve the Psychiatric Care of Help-Seeking Adolescents
Abstract
Objective: Effective treatment of adolescents with psychopathological disorders is essential to reduce later morbidity and disability.To evaluate the clinical value of a new adolescent Cooperative Assessment scheme (COOPAS) as indicated by establishing therapeutic alliance, improving symptoms, and particularly by reducing dropouts.
Method: Consecutive help-seeking adolescents (N=136) were recruited, evaluated with an 8-week COOPAS protocol and followed for 6 months to document dropouts during treatment. Clinical rating scales [Hamilton Depression and Anxiety scales (HAM-D, HAM-A), Global Functioning Role and Social Scales (GF-RS, GF-SS), Structured Interview for Prodromal Symptoms (SIPS), Clinical Global Impression (CGI), Working Alliance Inventory-Therapist version (WAI-T), Therapist Response Questionnaire (TRQ), Psychotherapy Relationship Questionnaire (PRQ)] were administered at intake, 4 weeks later, and at the end of COOPAS evaluation (8 weeks).
Results: Final HAM-A and HAM-D scores improved by 25%; CGI, GF-SS and GF-RS also improved significantly. Similarly, WAI-T showed significant improvements in all three subscales, and patient-clinician relationships (PRQ) showed decreases in Anxious/Preoccupied and Avoidant/Counterdependent dimensions with increases of the Secure/Engaged measure. After 6 months, dropout rate was 8.82%.
Conclusions: COOPAS assessment was followed by reduced depressive and anxiety symptoms, good therapeutic alliance, and low dropout in adolescents.
Keywords: adolescents; anxiety; cooperative assessment; depression; dropout.
© 2019 Giovanni Fioriti Editore s.r.l.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: No author or any immediate family member has current financial relationships with commercial organizations that might present the appearance of a potential conflict of interest with the material presented.
References
-
- Baekeland, F., & Lundwall, L. (1975). Dropping out of treatment: a critical review. Psychological Bulletin, 82(5), 738–783. - PubMed
-
- Barrett, M. S., Chua, W., Crits-Christoph, P., Gibbons, M. B., Casiano, D., & Thompson, D. (2009). "Early withdrawal from mental health treatment: Implications for psychotherapy practice": Correction to Barrett et al (2008). Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 46(2), 248–248. 10.1037/a0016184 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Baruch, G., Vrouva, I., & Fearon, P. (2009). A Follow-up Study of Characteristics of Young People that Dropout and Continue Psychotherapy: Service Implications for a Clinic in the Community. Child and Adolescent Mental Health, 14(2), 69–75. 10.1111/j.1475-3588.2008.00492.x - DOI
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources