Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Apr 19;107(5):e2177-e2185.
doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgab869.

Inequity in Adoption of Advanced Diabetes Technologies Among Medicare Fee-for-service Beneficiaries

Affiliations

Inequity in Adoption of Advanced Diabetes Technologies Among Medicare Fee-for-service Beneficiaries

Kael Wherry et al. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. .

Abstract

Context: Health inequity is often associated with race-ethnicity.

Objective: To determine the prevalence of insulin pump therapy and continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) among Medicare beneficiaries with type 1 diabetes (T1D) by race-ethnicity, and to compare diabetes-related technology users with nonusers.

Design: The prevalence of technology use (pump, CGM) was determined by race-ethnicity for enrollees in coverage years (CY) 2017-2019 in the Medicare fee-for-service database. Using CY2019 data, technology users were compared with nonusers by race-ethnicity, sex, average age, Medicare eligibility criteria, and visit to an endocrinologist.

Setting: Community.

Patients or other participants: Beneficiaries with T1D and at least 1 inpatient or 2 outpatient claims in a CY.

Intervention(s): Pump or CGM therapy, visit to an endocrinologist.

Main outcome measure(s): Diabetes-related technology use by race-ethnicity groups.

Results: Between 2017 and 2019, CGM and insulin pump use increased among all groups. Prevalence of insulin pump use was < 5% for Black and Other beneficiaries yet increased from 14% to 18% among White beneficiaries. In CY2019, 57% of White patients used a pump compared with 33.1% of Black and 30.3% of Other patients (P < 0.001). Black patients were more likely than White patients to be eligible because of disability/end-stage renal disease or to be Medicare/Medicaid eligible (both P < 0.001), whether using technology or not. Significant race-ethnicity differences (P < 0.001) existed between technology users and nonusers for all evaluated factors except visiting an endocrinologist.

Conclusions: Significant race-ethnicity associated differences existed in T1D management. The gap in diabetic technology adoption between Black and White beneficiaries grew between 2017 and 2019.

Keywords: Medicare; continuous glucose monitoring; insulin pump; race-ethnicity; type 1 diabetes.

PubMed Disclaimer