Delphi consensus on the American Society of Anesthesiologists' physical status classification in an Asian tertiary women's hospital
- PMID: 34911175
- PMCID: PMC8980290
- DOI: 10.4097/kja.21426
Delphi consensus on the American Society of Anesthesiologists' physical status classification in an Asian tertiary women's hospital
Abstract
Background: The American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score is generated based on patients' clinical status. Accurate ASA classification is essential for the communication of perioperative risks and resource planning. Literature suggests that ASA classification can be automated for consistency and time-efficiency. To develop a rule-based algorithm for automated ASA classification, this study seeks to establish consensus in ASA classification for clinical conditions encountered at a tertiary women's hospital.
Methods: Thirty-seven anesthesia providers rated their agreement on a 4-point Likert scale to ASA scores assigned to items via the Delphi technique. After Round 1, the group's collective responses and individual item scores were shared with participants to improve their responses for Round 2. For each item, the percentage agreement ('agree' and 'strongly agree' responses combined), median (interquartile range/IQR), and SD were calculated. Consensus for each item was defined as a percentage agreement ≥ 70%, IQR 1.0, and SD < 1.0.
Results: All participants completed the study and none had missing data. The number of items that reached consensus increased from 25 (51.0%) to 37 (75.5%) in the second Delphi round, particularly for items assigned ASA scores of III and IV. Nine items, which pertained to alcohol intake, asthma, thyroid disease, limited exercise tolerance, and stable angina, did not reach consensus even after two Delphi rounds.
Conclusions: Delphi consensus was attained for 37 of the 49 study items (75.5%), facilitating their incorporation into a rule-based clinical support system designed to automate the prediction of ASA classification.
Keywords: Algorithm; Classification; Clinical decision-making; Consensus; Preoperative care; Risk assessment.
Conflict of interest statement
No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.
Figures
Similar articles
-
The Pediatric-Specific American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Score: A Multicenter Study.Anesth Analg. 2021 Mar 1;132(3):807-817. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000005025. Anesth Analg. 2021. PMID: 32665468
-
Evaluating the accuracy of ChatGPT-4 in predicting ASA scores: A prospective multicentric study ChatGPT-4 in ASA score prediction.J Clin Anesth. 2024 Sep;96:111475. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2024.111475. Epub 2024 Apr 23. J Clin Anesth. 2024. PMID: 38657530
-
One Size Does Not Fit All: A Perspective on the American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Classification for Pediatric Patients.Anesth Analg. 2020 Jun;130(6):1685-1692. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000004277. Anesth Analg. 2020. PMID: 31219919
-
Developing a Checklist: Consensus Via a Modified Delphi Technique.J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2016 Aug;30(4):855-8. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2016.02.022. Epub 2016 Feb 24. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2016. PMID: 27256448
-
Injury risk factors and their priority for mitigation in women's netball: a systematic review and Delphi consensus.Br J Sports Med. 2025 Feb 20;59(5):294-305. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2024-108756. Br J Sports Med. 2025. PMID: 39753322
Cited by
-
The Nomogram Model and Factors for the Postoperative Mortality of Elderly Patients with Femoral Neck Fracture Undergoing Artificial Hip Arthroplasty: A Single-Institution 6-Year Experience.Orthop Surg. 2024 Feb;16(2):391-400. doi: 10.1111/os.13944. Epub 2023 Dec 27. Orthop Surg. 2024. PMID: 38151885 Free PMC article.
-
Dose-response study of propofol combined with two different doses of esketamine for laryngeal mask airway insertion in women undergoing hysteroscopy.Heliyon. 2024 Apr 30;10(9):e30511. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e30511. eCollection 2024 May 15. Heliyon. 2024. PMID: 38765139 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Pasternak LR, Arens JF, Caplan RA, Connis RT, Fleisher LA, Flowerdew R, et al. Practice advisory for preanesthesia evaluation: an updated report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Preanesthesia Evaluation. Anesthesiology. 2012;116:522–38. - PubMed
-
- American Society of Anesthesiologists . Schaumburg (IL): ASA; 2014. ASA physical status classification system [Internet] Oct 15 [updated 2020 Dec 13; cited 2021 Oct 13]. Available from https://www.asahq.org/standards-and-guidelines/asa-physical-status-class....
-
- Enneking FK, Radhakrishnan NS, Berg K, Patel S, Wishin JM, Vasilopoulos T. Patient-centered anesthesia triage system predicts ASA physical status. Anesth Analg. 2017;124:1957–62. - PubMed
-
- Mak PH, Campbell RC, Irwin MG, American Society of Anesthesiologists The ASA Physical Status Classification: inter-observer consistency. American Society of Anesthesiologists. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2002;30:633–40. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources