Reconsidering the Utility of Race-Specific Lung Function Prediction Equations
- PMID: 34913855
- PMCID: PMC9836221
- DOI: 10.1164/rccm.202105-1246OC
Reconsidering the Utility of Race-Specific Lung Function Prediction Equations
Erratum in
-
Erratum: Reconsidering the Utility of Race-Specific Lung Function Prediction Equations.Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2022 Jul 15;206(2):230. doi: 10.1164/rccm.v206erratum1. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2022. PMID: 35838593 No abstract available.
Abstract
Rationale: African American individuals have worse outcomes in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Objectives: To assess whether race-specific approaches for estimating lung function contribute to racial inequities by failing to recognize pathological decrements and considering them normal. Methods: In a cohort with and at risk for COPD, we assessed whether lung function prediction equations applied in a race-specific versus universal manner better modeled the relationship between FEV1, FVC, and other COPD outcomes, including the COPD Assessment Test, St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire, computed tomography percent emphysema, airway wall thickness, and 6-minute-walk test. We related these outcomes to differences in FEV1 using multiple linear regression and compared predictive performance between fitted models using root mean squared error and Alpaydin's paired F test. Measurements and Main Results: Using race-specific equations, African American individuals were calculated to have better lung function than non-Hispanic White individuals (FEV1, 76.8% vs. 71.8% predicted; P = 0.02). Using universally applied equations, African American individuals were calculated to have worse lung function. Using Hankinson's Non-Hispanic White equation, FEV1 was 64.7% versus 71.8% (P < 0.001). Using the Global Lung Initiative's Other race equation, FEV1 was 70.0% versus 77.9% (P < 0.001). Prediction errors from linear regression were less for universally applied equations compared with race-specific equations when examining FEV1% predicted with the COPD Assessment Test (P < 0.01), St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (P < 0.01), and airway wall thickness (P < 0.01). Although African American participants had greater adversity (P < 0.001), less adversity was only associated with better FEV1 in non-Hispanic White participants (P for interaction = 0.041). Conclusions: Race-specific equations may underestimate COPD severity in African American individuals.Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01969344).
Keywords: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; health disparities; racism; respiratory function tests.
Figures



Comment in
-
Is There a Role for Using Race-Specific Reference Equations? Yes and No.Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2022 Apr 1;205(7):746-748. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202201-0006ED. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2022. PMID: 35196477 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
U.S. Occupational Historical Perspective on Race and Lung Function.Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2022 Sep 15;206(6):789-790. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202203-0565LE. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2022. PMID: 35503517 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Vyas DA, Eisenstein LG, Jones DS. Hidden in plain sight - reconsidering the use of race correction in clinical algorithms. N Engl J Med . 2020;383:874–882. - PubMed
-
- Cartwright SA.Slavery in the light of ethnologyElliott EN.Cotton is king and pro-slavery arguments 3rd ed.Augusta, GA: Pritchard, Abbott & Loomis; 1860692–728..
-
- Damon A. Negro-white differences in pulmonary function (vital capacity, timed vital capacity, and expiratory flow rate) Hum Biol . 1966;38:381–393. - PubMed
-
- Culver BH, Graham BL, Coates AL, Wanger J, Berry CE, Clarke PK, et al. ATS Committee on Proficiency Standards for Pulmonary Function Laboratories Recommendations for a standardized pulmonary function report. An official American Thoracic Society technical statement. Am J Respir Crit Care Med . 2017;196:1463–1472. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
Grants and funding
- HHSN268200900019C/HL/NHLBI NIH HHS/United States
- U24 HL141762/HL/NHLBI NIH HHS/United States
- F32 HL158160/HL/NHLBI NIH HHS/United States
- K24HL137013/HL/NHLBI NIH HHS/United States
- HL137013/HL/NHLBI NIH HHS/United States
- K24 HL137013/HL/NHLBI NIH HHS/United States
- HHSN268200900015C/HL/NHLBI NIH HHS/United States
- K23HL125551/HL/NHLBI NIH HHS/United States
- U01 HL137880/HL/NHLBI NIH HHS/United States
- U01HL137880/HL/NHLBI NIH HHS/United States
- HHSN268200900014C/HL/NHLBI NIH HHS/United States
- HHSN268200900016C/HL/NHLBI NIH HHS/United States
- F32HL158160/HL/NHLBI NIH HHS/United States
- HHSN268200900018C/HL/NHLBI NIH HHS/United States
- P30 DK054759/DK/NIDDK NIH HHS/United States
- HHSN268200900017C/HL/NHLBI NIH HHS/United States
- HHSN268200900020C/HL/NHLBI NIH HHS/United States
- K23 HL125551/HL/NHLBI NIH HHS/United States
- HHSN268200900013C/HL/NHLBI NIH HHS/United States
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Molecular Biology Databases