Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2021 Dec;49(12):3000605211062770.
doi: 10.1177/03000605211062770.

Comparison between febuxostat and allopurinol uric acid-lowering therapy in patients with chronic heart failure and hyperuricemia: a multicenter randomized controlled trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Comparison between febuxostat and allopurinol uric acid-lowering therapy in patients with chronic heart failure and hyperuricemia: a multicenter randomized controlled trial

Satoshi Suzuki et al. J Int Med Res. 2021 Dec.

Abstract

Objective: Heart failure (HF) is a common and highly morbid cardiovascular disorder. Oxidative stress worsens HF, and uric acid (UA) is a useful oxidative stress marker. The novel anti-hyperuricemic drug febuxostat is a potent non-purine selective xanthine oxidase inhibitor. The present study examined the UA-lowering and prognostic effects of febuxostat in patients with HF compared with conventional allopurinol.

Methods: This multicenter, randomized trial included 263 patients with chronic HF who were randomly assigned to two groups and received allopurinol or febuxostat (UA >7.0 mg/dL). All patients were followed up for 3 years after enrollment.

Results: There were no significant differences in baseline clinical characteristics between the two groups. The UA level was significantly decreased after 3 years of drug administration compared with the baseline in both groups. Urine levels of the oxidative stress marker 8-hydroxy-2'-deoxyguanosine were lower in the febuxostat group than in the allopurinol group (11.0 ± 9.6 vs. 22.9 ± 15.9 ng/mL), and the rate of patients free from hospitalization due to worsening HF tended to be higher in the febuxostat group than in the allopurinol group (89.0% vs. 83.0%).

Conclusions: Febuxostat is potentially more effective than allopurinol for treating patients with chronic HF and hyperuricemia.This study was registered in the University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry (https://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/; ID: 000009817).

Keywords: Heart failure; febuxostat; oxidative stress; prognosis; uric acid; worsening heart failure.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of conflicting interest: The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Patient selection flowchart according to CONSORT guidelines in this study.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Comparison of urine 8-hydroxy-2′-deoxyguanosine (8-OHdG) levels at 3 years between the allopurinol (n = 135) and febuxostat groups (n = 128) (22.9 ± 15.9 vs. 11.0 ± 9.6 ng/mL, P < 0.001). 8-OHdG levels were measured using a commercially available enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kit.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Kaplan–Meier analyses for patients free from cardiovascular events in the febuxostat and allopurinol groups. During this study period, 12 cardiovascular deaths and 37 hospitalizations due to worsening heart failure occurred. Numbers of followed-up patients in respective groups were indicated at the bottom of the figure.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Kaplan–Meier analyses for patients free from hospitalization due to worsening heart failure in the febuxostat and allopurinol groups. Numbers of followed-up patients in respective groups were indicated at the bottom of the figure.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
Comparison of urine 8-hydroxy-2′-deoxyguanosine (8-OHdG) levels at 3 years between allopurinol and febuxostat users divided into two groups based on the left ventricular ejection fraction. 8-OHdG levels were measured using a commercially available enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kit. a) Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) (n = 173) (24.1 ± 15.6 vs. 10.9 ± 8.9 ng/mL, P < 0.001). b) Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) (n = 86) (17.9 ± 12.2 vs. 11.4 ± 10.5 ng/mL, P = 0.212).
Figure 6.
Figure 6.
Kaplan–Meier analyses for patients free from hospitalization due to worsening heart failure in the febuxostat and allopurinol groups. Numbers of followed-up patients in respective groups were indicated at the bottom of the figure. (a) Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) (log-rank, P = 0.037). (b) Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) (log-rank, P = 0.467).

References

    1. Yancy CW, Jessup M, Bozkurt B, et al.. 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of heart failure: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013; 62: e147–e239. - PubMed
    1. Ponikowski P, Voors AA, Anker SD, et al.. 2016 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure: The Task Force for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Developed with the special contribution of the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC. Eur J Heart Fail 2016; 18: 891–975. - PubMed
    1. Van Der Pol A, Van Gilst WH, Voors AA, et al.. Treating oxidative stress in heart failure: past, present and future. Eur J Heart Fail 2019; 21: 425–435. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ayoub KF, Pothineni NVK, Rutland J, et al.. Immunity, Inflammation, and Oxidative Stress in Heart Failure: Emerging Molecular Targets. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther 2017; 31: 593–608. - PubMed
    1. Takeishi Y. Biomarkers in heart failure. Int Heart J 2014; 55: 474–481. - PubMed

Publication types