Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2022 Mar;128(3):416-433.
doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2021.10.046. Epub 2021 Dec 13.

Goal-directed haemodynamic therapy during general anaesthesia for noncardiac surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Goal-directed haemodynamic therapy during general anaesthesia for noncardiac surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Marie K Jessen et al. Br J Anaesth. 2022 Mar.

Abstract

Background: During general anaesthesia for noncardiac surgery, there remain knowledge gaps regarding the effect of goal-directed haemodynamic therapy on patient-centred outcomes.

Methods: Included clinical trials investigated goal-directed haemodynamic therapy during general anaesthesia in adults undergoing noncardiac surgery and reported at least one patient-centred postoperative outcome. PubMed and Embase were searched for relevant articles on March 8, 2021. Two investigators performed abstract screening, full-text review, data extraction, and bias assessment. The primary outcomes were mortality and hospital length of stay, whereas 15 postoperative complications were included based on availability. From a main pool of comparable trials, meta-analyses were performed on trials with homogenous outcome definitions. Certainty of evidence was evaluated using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE).

Results: The main pool consisted of 76 trials with intermediate risk of bias for most outcomes. Overall, goal-directed haemodynamic therapy might reduce mortality (odds ratio=0.84; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.64 to 1.09) and shorten length of stay (mean difference=-0.72 days; 95% CI, -1.10 to -0.35) but with low certainty in the evidence. For both outcomes, larger effects favouring goal-directed haemodynamic therapy were seen in abdominal surgery, very high-risk surgery, and using targets based on preload variation by the respiratory cycle. However, formal tests for subgroup differences were not statistically significant. Goal-directed haemodynamic therapy decreased risk of several postoperative outcomes, but only infectious outcomes and anastomotic leakage reached moderate certainty of evidence.

Conclusions: Goal-directed haemodynamic therapy during general anaesthesia might decrease mortality, hospital length of stay, and several postoperative complications. Only infectious postoperative complications and anastomotic leakage reached moderate certainty in the evidence.

Keywords: fluid; general anaesthesia; goal-directed haemodynamic therapy; haemodynamics; perioperative care; postoperative complications; stroke volume.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None of the authors have any conflicts of interests.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1
Overall results for all binary outcomes. Results from meta-analyses comparing GDHT with standard care for all binary outcomes. Estimates are odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals. Number of trials included in the analyses and patients with events vs totals are reported for both GDHT and standard care groups. Figures of individual forest plots are shown in eFigures 3, 6, 37, 41, 43, 45, 47, 49, 53, 55, 59, 62, and 65. ARDS, acute respiratory distress syndrome; CI, confidence interval; GDHT, goal-directed haemodynamic therapy.
Fig 2
Fig 2
Subgroup results for mortality. Subgroup results from meta-analyses comparing GDHT with standard care for mortality. Estimates are odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals. Number of trials included in the analyses and patients with events vs totals are reported for both GDHT and standard care groups in all subgroups. P-values for formal test of subgroup differences are presented in the rightmost column. Definitions of all subgroups are provided in Supplementary Content S2. Figures of individual forest plots are shown in eFigures 9–16. CI, confidence interval; GDHT, goal-directed haemodynamic therapy.
Fig 3
Fig 3
Subgroup results for hospital length of stay. Subgroup results from meta-analyses comparing GDHT with standard care for hospital length of stay. Estimates are mean differences with 95% confidence intervals. Number of trials included in the analyses and number of patients are reported for both GDHT and standard care groups in all subgroups. P-values for formal test of subgroup differences are presented in the rightmost column. Definitions of all subgroups are provided in Supplementary Content S2. Figures of individual forest plots are shown in eFigures 17–24. CI, confidence interval; GDHT, goal-directed haemodynamic therapy.

Comment in

References

    1. Weiser T.G., Haynes A.B., Molina G., et al. Size and distribution of the global volume of surgery in 2012. Bull World Health Organ. 2016;94:201–209F. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Global patient outcomes after elective surgery: prospective cohort study in 27 low-, middle- and high-income countries. Br J Anaesth. 2016;117:601–609. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Biccard B.M., Madiba T.E., Kluyts H.L., et al. Perioperative patient outcomes in the African Surgical Outcomes Study: a 7-day prospective observational cohort study. Lancet. 2018;391:1589–1598. - PubMed
    1. Gleason L.J., Schmitt E.M., Kosar C.M., et al. Effect of delirium and other major complications on outcomes after elective surgery in older adults. JAMA Surg. 2015;150:1134–1140. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Schmitt E.M., Saczynski J.S., Kosar C.M., et al. The Successful Aging after Elective Surgery (SAGES) study: cohort description and data quality procedures. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2015;63:2463–2471. - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms