Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Dec 16;11(1):23547.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-02844-5.

Distance sampling surveys reveal 17 million vertebrates directly killed by the 2020's wildfires in the Pantanal, Brazil

Affiliations

Distance sampling surveys reveal 17 million vertebrates directly killed by the 2020's wildfires in the Pantanal, Brazil

Walfrido Moraes Tomas et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

Anthropogenic factors have significantly influenced the frequency, duration, and intensity of meteorological drought in many regions of the globe, and the increased frequency of wildfires is among the most visible consequences of human-induced climate change. Despite the fire role in determining biodiversity outcomes in different ecosystems, wildfires can cause negative impacts on wildlife. We conducted ground surveys along line transects to estimate the first-order impact of the 2020 wildfires on vertebrates in the Pantanal wetland, Brazil. We adopted the distance sampling technique to estimate the densities and the number of dead vertebrates in the 39,030 square kilometers affected by fire. Our estimates indicate that at least 16.952 million vertebrates were killed immediately by the fires in the Pantanal, demonstrating the impact of such an event in wet savanna ecosystems. The Pantanal case also reminds us that the cumulative impact of widespread burning would be catastrophic, as fire recurrence may lead to the impoverishment of ecosystems and the disruption of their functioning. To overcome this unsustainable scenario, it is necessary to establish proper biomass fuel management to avoid cumulative impacts caused by fire over biodiversity and ecosystem services.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Distribution of surveyed locations (transects) to estimate first order vertebrate mortality in the area hit by wildfires in the Brazilian portion of Pantanal wetland in 2020. Burned area source: Laboratory for Environmental Satellite Applications (LASA), 2020 available at https://alarmes.lasa.ufrj.br/login.

Comment in

  • Argentina: wildfires jeopardize rewilding.
    Di Bitetti MS, De Angelo C, Paviolo A, Di Giacomo AS, Varela D, Giraudo AR. Di Bitetti MS, et al. Nature. 2022 Apr;604(7905):246. doi: 10.1038/d41586-022-01006-5. Nature. 2022. PMID: 35414662 No abstract available.

References

    1. Chiang F, Mazdiyasni O, AghaKouchak A. Evidence of anthropogenic impacts on global drought frequency, duration, and intensity. Nat. Commun. 2021;12:2754. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Spinoni J, Naumann G, Carrao H, Barbosa P, Vogt J. World drought frequency, duration, and severity for 1951–2010. Int. J. Climatol. 2014;34:2792–2804.
    1. Duane A, Castellnou M, Brotons L. Towards a comprehensive look at global drivers of novel extreme wildfire events. Clim. Change. 2021;165(3):1–21.
    1. Krawchuk MA, Moritz MA, Parisien MA, Van Dorn J, Hayhoe K. Global Pyrogeography: The current and future distribution of wildfire. PLoS ONE. 2009;4(4):e5102. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Williams AP, et al. Observed impacts of anthropogenic climate change on wildfire in California. Earth's Fut. 2019;7:892–910.

Publication types