COVID-19 Isolation and Contact Tracing with Country Samples: A Systematic Review
- PMID: 34917525
- PMCID: PMC8643526
- DOI: 10.18502/ijph.v50i8.6800
COVID-19 Isolation and Contact Tracing with Country Samples: A Systematic Review
Abstract
Background: COVID-19 was first declared as an international public health emergency and then a pandemic by the WHO. In this systematic review, the importance of isolation and contact tracing has been explained, and what kinds of practices exist in different countries are mentioned.
Methods: A systematic review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA and Cochrane guidelines by searching articles from major medical databases such as Google Scholar, PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, CINAHL between Jan 1, 2020 and Apr 1, 2021. Observational and modeling studies written on contact tracing, screening, quarantine and isolation were included.
Results: 27 observational and modeling studies were included. It was seen that rapid contact tracing to reduce the basic reproduction number (R0) from 3.11 to 0.21. Additionally, each new case requires an average of 36 people to be monitored. Since screening programs missed 75% of cases, high-level contact tracing should also be done simultaneously. Wide quarantine would prevent 79.27% deaths and 87.08% infections.
Conclusion: Effective, rapid contact tracing is the cornerstone of an effective public health response in outbreaks. Its success depends on quickly identifying cases, gathering information from them about their last contacts, and tracing and isolating those contacts.
Keywords: COVID-19; Contact tracing; Isolation; Quarantine.
Copyright © 2021 Koçak. Published by Tehran University of Medical Sciences.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of interest The author has no conflicts of interest to declare.
Figures
References
-
- World Health Organization (2020). Statement on the second meeting of the International Health Regulations Emergency Committee regarding the outbreak of novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV). Available from: https://www.who.int/news/item/30-01-2020-statement-on-the-second-meeting...
-
- European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (2020). Rapid risk assessment: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in the EU/EEA and the UK-eighth update 2020. Available from: https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/sites/default/files/documents/covid-19-rapid-...
-
- Shamseer L, Moher D, Clarke M, et al. (2015). Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation. BMJ, 350: g7647 doi: 10.1136/bmj.g7647 - PubMed
-
- Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, et al. (2019). Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. 2nd ed. The Cochrane Collaboration and John Wiley & Sons Ltd, the United Kingdom.
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous