Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Dec 17;76(Suppl 3):S207-S214.
doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbab182.

Sample Design and Estimation in the National Social Life, Health, and Aging Project: Round 3 (2015-2016)

Colm O'Muircheartaigh  1 , Ned English  2 , Steven Pedlow  3 , L Philip Schumm  4
Affiliations

Sample Design and Estimation in the National Social Life, Health, and Aging Project: Round 3 (2015-2016)

Colm O'Muircheartaigh et al. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. .

Abstract

Objectives: This article, and corresponding articles for the earlier rounds of the National Social Life, Health, and Aging Project (NSHAP), provide the scientific underpinning for the statistical analysis of NSHAP data. The 2015-2016 round of data collection for NSHAP comprised the third wave of data collection for the original cohort born 1920-1947 (C1) and the first wave of data collection for a second cohort born 1948-1965 (C2). Here we describe (a) our protocol for reinterviewing C1; (b) our approach to the sample design for C2, including the frame construction, stratification, clustering, and within-household selection; and (c) the construction of cross-sectional weights for the entire 2015-2016 sample when analyzed at the individual level or when analyzed as a sample of cohabiting couples. We also provide guidance on computing design-based standard errors.

Methods: The sample for C2 was drawn independently of the C1 sample using the NORC U.S. National Sampling Frame. A probability sample of households containing at least one individual born 1948-1965 was drawn, and from these, each age-eligible individual was included together with their cohabiting spouse or partner (even if not age-eligible). This C2 sample was combined with the C1 sample to yield a sample representative of the U.S. population of adults born 1920-1965.

Results: Among C1, we conducted 2,409 interviews corresponding to a 91% conditional response rate (i.e., among previous respondents); the unconditional three-wave response rate for the original C1 sample was 71%. Among C2, we conducted 2,368 interviews corresponding to a response rate of 76%.

Discussion: Together C1 and C2 permit inference about the U.S. population of home-dwelling adults born from 1920 to 1965. In addition, three waves of data from C1 are now available, permitting longitudinal analyses of health outcomes and their determinants among older adults.

Keywords: Cohort study; Health outcomes; Population aging; Sampling frame; Sampling weights; Survey nonresponse; Variance estimation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Year of birth for age-eligible respondents in Cohorts 1 and 2.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Year of birth for all respondents in Cohorts 1 and 2.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Binder, D. A. (1983). On the variances of asymptotically normal estimators from complex surveys. International Statistical Review, 51, 279–292. doi: 10.2307/1402588 - DOI
    1. Eckman, S., & O’Muircheartaigh, C. (2011). Performance of the half-open interval missed housing unit procedure. Survey Research Methods, 5(3), 125–131. doi: 10.18148/srm/2011.v5i3.4737 - DOI
    1. Harter, R., Battaglia, M. P., Buskirk, T. D., Dillman, D. A., English, N., Fahimi M., Frankel, M. R., Kennel, T., McMichael, J. P., McPhee, C. B., Montaquila, J., Yancey, T., & Zukerberg, A. L. (2016). Address-based sampling. Prepared for AAPOR Council by the Task Force on Address-based sampling, operating under the auspices of the AAPOR Standards Committee, Oakbrook Terrace, IL. http://www.aapor.org/getattachment/Education-Resources/Reports/AAPOR_Rep...
    1. Harter, R., Eckman, S., English, N., & O’Muircheartaigh, C. (2010). Applied sampling for large-scale multi-stage area probability designs. In Marsden P. and Wright J. (Eds.), The handbook of survey research (2nd ed.). Elsevier.
    1. Kalton, G. (1979). Ultimate cluster sampling. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (General), 142(2), 210–222. doi: 10.2307/2345081 - DOI