A plea for an experimental philosophy of medicine

Andreas De Block¹, Kristien Hens^{2

3}

Affiliations

¹ Centre for Logic and Philosophy of Science, Institute of Philosophy, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. andreas.deblock@kuleuven.be.
² Centre for Logic and Philosophy of Science, Institute of Philosophy, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
³ Department of Philosophy, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.

Editorial

Andreas De Block et al. Theor Med Bioeth. 2021 Aug.

. 2021 Aug;42(3-4):81-89.

doi: 10.1007/s11017-021-09551-2. Epub 2021 Dec 17.

Andreas De Block¹, Kristien Hens^{2

3}

¹ Centre for Logic and Philosophy of Science, Institute of Philosophy, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. andreas.deblock@kuleuven.be.
² Centre for Logic and Philosophy of Science, Institute of Philosophy, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
³ Department of Philosophy, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.

No abstract available

References

1. Simons, Peter. 2000. The four phases of philosophy: Brentano’s theory and Austria’s history. The Monist 83: 68–88. - DOI
1. Turner, Stephen. 2000. What are disciplines? And how is interdisciplinarity different. In Practising interdisciplinarity, ed. Nico Stehr and Peter Weingart, 46–65. Toronto: University of Toronto Press. - DOI
1. Mallon, Ron. 2016. The construction of human kinds. Oxford: Oxford University Press. - DOI
1. Knobe, Joshua. 2003. Intentional action and side effects in ordinary language. Analysis 63: 190–194. - DOI
1. Nichols, Shaun, and Joshua Knobe. 2007. Moral responsibility and determinism: The cognitive science of folk intuitions. Noûs 41: 663–685. - DOI