Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Mar 10;80(4):962-979.
doi: 10.1093/nutrit/nuab096.

A systematic review of adaptations and effectiveness of scaled-up nutrition interventions

Affiliations

A systematic review of adaptations and effectiveness of scaled-up nutrition interventions

Rachel L Sutherland et al. Nutr Rev. .

Abstract

Context: Public health nutrition interventions shown to be effective under optimal research conditions need to be scaled up and implemented in real-world settings.

Objectives: The primary aim for this review was to assess the effectiveness of scaled-up public health nutrition interventions with proven efficacy, as examined in a randomized controlled trial. Secondary objectives were to: 1) determine if the effect size of scaled-up interventions were comparable to the prescale effect, and; 2) identify any adaptations made during the scale-up process.

Data sources: Six electronic databases were searched and field experts contacted.

Study selection: An intervention was considered scaled up if it was delivered on a larger scale than a preceding randomized controlled trial ("prescale") in which a significant intervention effect (P ≤ 0.05) was reported on a measure of nutrition.

Data extraction: Two reviewers independently performed screening and data extraction. Effect size differences between prescale and scaled-up interventions were quantified. Adaptations to scale-up studies were coded according to the Adaptome model.

Results: Ten scaled-up nutrition interventions were identified. The effect size difference between prescale trials and scaled-up studies ranged from -32.2% to 222% (median, 50%). All studies made adaptations between prescale to scaled-up interventions.

Conclusion: The effects of nutrition interventions implemented at scale typically were half that achieved in prior efficacy trials. Identifying effective scale-up strategies and methods to support retainment of the original prescale effect size is urgently needed to inform public health policy.

Systematic review registration: PROSPERO registration no.CRD42020149267.

Keywords: adaptation; public health nutrition; scale-up; systematic review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PRISMA flow diagram of included studies

References

    1. Forouzanfar MH, Afshin A, Alexander LT, et al.Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 79 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks, 1990–2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. Lancet. 2016;388:1659–1724. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Afshin A, Sur PJ, Fay KA, et al.Health effects of dietary risks in 195 countries, 1990–2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet. 2019;393:1958–1972. - PMC - PubMed
    1. World Health Organization. Obesity. Available at: http://www.who.int/news-room/facts-in-pictures/detail/6-facts-on-obesity. Accessed June 26, 2018.
    1. World Health Organization. Physical activity. Available at: http://www.who.int/dietphysicalactivity/pa/en/. Accessed June 26, 2018.
    1. World Health Organization. Nutrition. 2020. Available at: http://www.who.int/topics/nutrition/en/. Accessed December 2020.

Publication types