The impact on obstetric and perinatal outcomes in term infants following the introduction of a colour-coded, hierarchical cardiotocography classification system: A retrospective non-inferiority study
- PMID: 34921390
- DOI: 10.1111/ajo.13469
The impact on obstetric and perinatal outcomes in term infants following the introduction of a colour-coded, hierarchical cardiotocography classification system: A retrospective non-inferiority study
Abstract
Background: Queensland introduced a colour-coded cardiotocograph (CTG) classification system (green, blue, yellow and red) to complement the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists prose-based classification system of 'low, unlikely, maybe or likely' fetal compromise.
Aims: The aim of the study was to determine the clinical impact of the introduction of the colour-coded CTG classification system compared to the prose-based system. We hypothesised there would be no change in the rate of operative delivery for intrapartum fetal compromise (OD-IFC).
Materials and methods: This retrospective non-inferiority study from November 2014 to May 2018 used routinely collected data from the Mater Mother's Hospital. Non-insured women with a singleton, non-anomalous, cephalic fetus at term, attempting a vaginal birth with continuous intrapartum CTG were included. The primary outcome was OD-IFC. Secondary outcomes included various obstetric and perinatal outcomes. Non-inferiority analysis was performed with a pre-specified non-inferiority margin of 2% risk difference.
Results: Eleven thousand seven hundred and twenty-seven participants were included. The OD-IFC rate was similar across the study groups (prose-based 15.1% vs colour-coded 15.3%, adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 1.02, 95% CI 0.93-1.13) with the adjusted risk difference of 0.29% (95% CI -0.98 to 1.56), which did not exceed the inferiority margin. There were more spontaneous (aOR 1.11, 95% CI 1.04-1.19) and fewer instrumental (aOR 0.87, 95% CI 0.80-0.95) vaginal births in the colour-coded cohort. There were no differences in neonatal outcomes.
Conclusions: Reassuringly, the colour-coded CTG classification system was non-inferior to the prose-based system, did not influence OD-IFC but was associated with more spontaneous vaginal deliveries.
Keywords: Australia; cardiotocography; fetal; guideline; health education; heart rate.
© 2021 The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.
Similar articles
-
Implementation of a revised classification for intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring and association to birth outcome: A national cohort study.Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2022 Feb;101(2):183-192. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14296. Epub 2022 Jan 28. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2022. PMID: 35092004 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of effect of CTG + STan with CTG alone on emergency Cesarean section rate: STan Australian Randomized controlled Trial (START).Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2023 Oct;62(4):462-470. doi: 10.1002/uog.26279. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2023. PMID: 37289946 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
A low fetal cerebroplacental ratio confers a greater risk of intrapartum fetal compromise and adverse neonatal outcomes in low risk multiparous women at term.Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2018 Nov;230:15-21. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2018.09.010. Epub 2018 Sep 12. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2018. PMID: 30237135
-
Continuous cardiotocography during labour: Analysis, classification and management.Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2016 Jan;30:33-47. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2015.03.022. Epub 2015 Jun 25. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2016. PMID: 26165747 Review.
-
Intrapartum cardiotocograph monitoring and perinatal outcomes for women at risk: Literature review.Women Birth. 2020 Sep;33(5):411-418. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2019.10.002. Epub 2019 Oct 25. Women Birth. 2020. PMID: 31668871 Review.
References
-
- Alfirevic Z, Devane D, Gyte GM, Cuthbert A. Continuous cardiotocography (CTG) as a form of electronic fetal monitoring (EFM) for fetal assessment during labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017; 2: CD006066.
-
- Nelson KB, Dambrosia JM, Ting TY, Grether JK. Uncertain value of electronic fetal monitoring in predicting cerebral palsy. N Engl J Med 1996; 334: 613-618.
-
- Grimes DA, Peipert JF. Electronic fetal monitoring as a public health screening program: the arithmetic of failure. Obstet Gynecol 2010; 116: 1397-1400.
-
- Ayres-de-Campos D, Arteiro D, Costa-Santos C, Bernardes J. Knowledge of adverse neonatal outcome alters clinicians' interpretation of the intrapartum cardiotocograph. BJOG 2011; 118: 978-984.
-
- Blackwell SC, Grobman WA, Antoniewicz L, et al. Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the NICHD 3-tier fetal heart rate interpretation system. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011; 205: 378 e1-5.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources