Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 May;75(5):1670-1678.e2.
doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2021.11.064. Epub 2021 Dec 15.

Impact of the first COVID-19 pandemic peak and lockdown on the interventional management of carotid artery stenosis in France

Affiliations

Impact of the first COVID-19 pandemic peak and lockdown on the interventional management of carotid artery stenosis in France

Valentin Crespy et al. J Vasc Surg. 2022 May.

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the trends of carotid revascularization (endarterectomy [CEA], transfemoral carotid artery stenting [TFCAS]) for symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid stenosis before, during, and after the end of the first lockdown in 2020 in France.

Methods: Nationwide data were provided by the French National Hospital Discharge database (Programme de Médicalisation des Systèmes d'Information). We retrospectively analyzed patients admitted for CEA or TFCAS in all French public and private hospitals during a 9-month period (January-September) in 2017, 2018, 2019, and 2020. Procedures were identified using the French Common Classification of Medical Procedures. Stenoses were considered symptomatic in the presence of stroke and/or transient ischemic attack codes (according to the International Classification of Diseases-Tenth Revision) during the stay, and asymptomatic in the absence of these codes. Hospitalization rates in 2020 were compared with the rates in the same period in the 3 previous years.

Results: Between January and September 2020, 12,546 patients were hospitalized for carotid artery surgery (CEA and TFCAS) in France. Compared with the 3 previous years, there was a decrease in hospitalization rates for asymptomatic (-68.9%) and symptomatic (-12.6%) CEA procedures in April, starting at the pandemic peak concomitant with the first national lockdown. This decrease was significant for asymptomatic CEA (P < .001). After the lockdown, while CEA for asymptomatic stenosis returned to usual activity, CEA for symptomatic stenosis presented a significant rebound, up 18.52% in August compared with previous years. Lockdown also had consequences on TFCAS procedures, with fewer interventions for both asymptomatic (-60.53%) and symptomatic stenosis (-16.67%) in April.

Conclusions: This study demonstrates a severe decrease for all interventions during the first peak of the COVID-19 pandemic in France. However, the trends in the postlockdown period were different for the various procedures. These data can be used to anticipate future decisions and organization for cardiovascular care.

Keywords: Carotid artery stenosis; Carotid artery stenting; Carotid endarterectomy; Coronavirus disease 2019; Lockdown; Pandemic peak.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1
All carotid revascularization interventions in France in 2020 and in 2017-2019, and pandemic peak/number of hospitalizations.
Fig 2
Fig 2
Monthly comparison of hospitalizations for carotid endarterectomy in 2020 compared with January to September 2017-2019. A, Carotid endarterectomy (CEA). B, CEA for symptomatic stenoses. C, CEA for asymptomatic stenoses.
Fig 3
Fig 3
Monthly comparison of hospitalizations for carotid artery stenting in 2020 compared with January to September 2017-2019. A, Carotid artery stenting (CAS). B, CAS for symptomatic stenoses. C, CAS for asymptomatic stenoses.
Supplementary Fig (online only)
Supplementary Fig (online only)
Observed (Obs) and predicted (ITS) hospitalizations for carotid revascularization intervention for weeks 2 to 39 of 2020 in France, interrupted time series (ITS) analysis with three periods (before, during, after the first lockdown).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Hartnett K.P., Kite-Powell A., DeVies J., Coletta M.A., Boehmer T.K., Adjemian J., et al. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on emergency department visits - united States, January 1, 2019-May 30, 2020. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020;69:699–704. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mesnier J., Cottin Y., Coste P., Ferrari E., Schiele F., Lemesle G., et al. Hospital admissions for acute myocardial infarction before and after lockdown according to regional prevalence of COVID-19 and patient profile in France: a registry study. Lancet Public Healthe. 2020;5:e536–e542. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ball S., Banerjee A., Berry C., Boyle J.R., Bray B., Bradlow W., et al. Monitoring indirect impact of COVID-19 pandemic on services for cardiovascular diseases in the UK. Heart. 2020;106:1890–1897. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mafham M.M., Spata E., Goldacre R., Gair D., Curnow P., Bray M., et al. COVID-19 pandemic and admission rates for and management of acute coronary syndromes in England. Lancet. 2020;396:381–389. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bhatt A.S., Moscone A., McElrath E.E., Varshney A.S., Claggett B.L., Bhatt D.L., et al. Fewer hospitalizations for acute cardiovascular conditions during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020;76:280–288. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types