Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Dec 18;22(1):932.
doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05823-3.

RENaBack: low back pain patients in rehabilitation-study protocol for a multicenter, randomized controlled trial

Laura Puerto Valencia  1 , Diamantes Arampatzis  2 , Heidrun Beck  3 , Karsten Dreinhöfer  4 , David Drießlein  5 , Wilfried Mau  6 , Julia-Marie Zimmer  6 , Michael Schäfer  7 , Friedemann Steinfeldt  8 , Pia-Maria Wippert  9   10
Affiliations

RENaBack: low back pain patients in rehabilitation-study protocol for a multicenter, randomized controlled trial

Laura Puerto Valencia et al. Trials. .

Abstract

Background: Millions of people in Germany suffer from chronic pain, in which course and intensity are multifactorial. Besides physical injuries, certain psychosocial risk factors are involved in the disease process. The national health care guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of non-specific low back pain recommend the screening of psychosocial risk factors as early as possible, to be able to adapt the therapy to patient needs (e.g., unimodal or multimodal). However, such a procedure has been difficult to implement in practice and has not yet been integrated into the rehabilitation care structures across the country.

Methods: The aim of this study is to implement an individualized therapy and aftercare program within the rehabilitation offer of the German Pension Insurance in the area of orthopedics and to examine its success and sustainability in comparison to the previous standard aftercare program. The study is a multicenter randomized controlled trial including 1204 patients from six orthopedic rehabilitation clinics. A 2:1 allocation ratio to intervention (individualized and home-based rehabilitation aftercare) versus the control group (regular outpatient rehabilitation aftercare) is set. Upon admission to the rehabilitation clinic, participants in the intervention group will be screened according to their psychosocial risk profile. They could then receive either unimodal or multimodal, together with an individualized training program. The program is instructed in the clinic (approximately 3 weeks) and will continue independently at home afterwards for 3 months. The success of the program is examined by means of a total of four surveys. The co-primary outcomes are the Characteristic Pain Intensity and Disability Score assessed by the German version of the Chronic Pain Grade questionnaire (CPG).

Discussion: An improvement in terms of pain, work ability, patient compliance, and acceptance in our intervention program compared to the standard aftercare is expected. The study contributes to provide individualized care also to patients living far away from clinical centers.

Trial registration: DRKS, DRKS00020373 . Registered on 15 April 2020.

Keywords: Aftercare; Chronic low back pain; Individualized therapy; Randomized controlled trial; Rehabilitation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow chart of the study procedure
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Flow chart of the intervention allocation
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Flow chart of the Risk Stratification Index (RSI) allocation procedure into the unimodal or multimodal arm
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Schedule of enrollment, interventions, and assessments
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Hoy D, March L, Brooks P, Blyth F, Woolf A, Bain C, Williams G, Smith E, Vos T, Barendregt J, Murray C, Burstein R, Buchbinder R. The global burden of low back pain: estimates from the Global Burden of Disease 2010 study. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases. 2014;73(6):968–974. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-204428. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation. Germany Health Data [Internet]. University of Washington. 2019. Available from: http://www.healthdata.org/germany.
    1. IGES Institut GmbH. DAK-Gesundheitsreport 2019 Germany2019 [Available from: https://www.dak.de/dak/download/dak-gesundheitsreport-2019-sucht-pdf-207....
    1. Statistisches-Bundesamt. Krankheitskosten in Mio. € für Deutschland 2015 [Available from: http://www.gbe-bund.de/gbe10/pkg_isgbe5.prc_isgbe?p_uid=gast&p_aid=31363....
    1. von der Lippe E, Krause L, Porst M, Wengler A, Leddin J, Müller A, et al. Prevalence of back and neck pain in Germany. Results from the BURDEN 2020 Burden of Disease Study. 2021(S3):1--14. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources