Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) clinical practice guidelines on the management of lateral epicondylitis of the humerus - Secondary publication
- PMID: 34922804
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jos.2021.09.003
Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) clinical practice guidelines on the management of lateral epicondylitis of the humerus - Secondary publication
Abstract
Background: The guidelines presented herein provide recommendations for the management of patients with lateral epicondylitis of the humerus. These recommendations are endorsed by the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) and Japan Elbow Society.
Methods: The JOA lateral epicondylitis guideline committee revised the previous guidelines on the basis of the "Medical Information Network Distribution Service Handbook for Clinical Practice Guideline Development 2014", which emphasized the importance of the balance between benefit and harm, and proposed a desirable method for preparing clinical guidelines in Japan. These guidelines consist of 11 clinical questions (CQs), 9 background questions (BQs), and 3 future research questions (FRQs). For each CQ, outcomes from the literature were collected and evaluated systematically according to the adopted study design.
Results: The committee proposed recommendations for each CQ by determining the level of evidence and assessing the consensus rate. Physical therapy was the best recommendation with the best evidence. The BQs and FRQs were answered by collecting evidence based on the literature.
Conclusions: The guidelines presented herein were reviewed systematically, and recommendations were proposed for each CQ. These guidelines are expected to be widely used not only by surgeons or physicians but also by other healthcare providers, such as nurses, therapists, and athletic trainers.
Copyright © 2021 The Japanese Orthopaedic Association. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of competing interest Conflicts of interest (2015–2017) were confirmed via self-reporting by all the members of the Lateral Epicondylitis Guideline Committee. No company was directly involved in the guideline recommendations and the systematic review team. The Executive Director and members declared that no company was directly involved in the recommended text for the clinical questions. To minimize bias and conflict of interest in the text, all the members voted on the recommended decisions, excluding the persons in charge of the text in question. The authors focused on the consensus of the members during guideline development. Funds required to prepare the guidelines were provided by the JOA. No support was received from any other organization or company.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical