Hepatic fibrosis 2022: Unmet needs and a blueprint for the future
- PMID: 34923653
- PMCID: PMC12179971
- DOI: 10.1002/hep.32285
Hepatic fibrosis 2022: Unmet needs and a blueprint for the future
Abstract
Steady progress over four decades toward understanding the pathogenesis and clinical consequences of hepatic fibrosis has led to the expectation of effective antifibrotic drugs, yet none has been approved. Thus, an assessment of the field is timely, to clarify priorities and accelerate progress. Here, we highlight the successes to date but, more importantly, identify gaps and unmet needs, both experimentally and clinically. These include the need to better define cell-cell interactions and etiology-specific elements of fibrogenesis and their link to disease-specific drivers of portal hypertension. Success in treating viral hepatitis has revealed the remarkable capacity of the liver to degrade scar in reversing fibrosis, yet we know little of the mechanisms underlying this response. Thus, there is an exigent need to clarify the cellular and molecular mechanisms of fibrosis regression in order for therapeutics to mimic the liver's endogenous capacity. Better refined and more predictive in vitro and animal models will hasten drug development. From a clinical perspective, current diagnostics are improving but not always biologically plausible or sufficiently accurate to supplant biopsy. More urgently, digital pathology methods that leverage machine learning and artificial intelligence must be validated in order to capture more prognostic information from liver biopsies and better quantify the response to therapies. For more refined treatment of NASH, orthogonal approaches that integrate genetic, clinical, and pathological data sets may yield treatments for specific subphenotypes of the disease. Collectively, these and other advances will strengthen and streamline clinical trials and better link histologic responses to clinical outcomes.
© 2021 American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.
Conflict of interest statement
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
Dr. Pinzani consults for, advises, and owns stock in Hepatotargets Bit-Bio. He consults for, owns stock in, and holds intellectual property rights with Engitix. He consults for and advises Promethera, ChemomAb, Takeda, LimmTech, Resolution Therapeutics, Dicerna, AstraZeneca, and Galecto. He is cofounder and owns stock in 3P-Sense Ltd. Dr. Friedman consults for and owns stock in Blade, Escient, Galmed, Glympse, Hepgene, Morphic, North Sea, Scholar Rock, and Surrozen. He consults for 89BIO, Amgen, Axcella, Bristol-Meyers Squibb, Can-Fite, ChemomAb, Forbion, Foresite, Gordian, Glycotest, In sitro, Novartis, Ono, and Pfizer. He owns stock in Galectin, Genfit, Intercept, Madrigal, Group K, Lifemax, Metacrine, and Nimbus.
Figures
References
-
- Pinzani M, Macias-Barragan J. Update on the pathophysiology of liver fibrosis. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010;4:459–72. - PubMed
-
- Popper H, Uenfriend S. Hepatic fibrosis. Correlation of biochemical and morphologic investigations. Am J Med. 1970;49:707–21. - PubMed
-
- Pinzani M, Rombouts K. Liver fibrosis: from the bench to clinical targets. Dig Liver Dis. 2004;36:231–42. - PubMed
-
- Pellicoro A, Ramachandran P, Iredale JP, Fallowfield JA. Liver fibrosis and repair: immune regulation of wound healing in a solid organ. Nat Rev Immunol. 2014;14:181–94. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
