Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Oct 19;11(10):2319-2326.
doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2021.158. Epub 2021 Nov 10.

Evidence-Informed Deliberative Processes for Legitimate Health Benefit Package Design - Part I: Conceptual Framework

Rob Baltussen  1 , Maarten Jansen  1 , Wija Oortwijn  1
Affiliations

Evidence-Informed Deliberative Processes for Legitimate Health Benefit Package Design - Part I: Conceptual Framework

Rob Baltussen et al. Int J Health Policy Manag. .

Abstract

Background: Countries around the world are increasingly rethinking the design of their health benefit packages to achieve universal health coverage (UHC). Health technology assessment (HTA) bodies support governments in these decisions, but employ value frameworks that do not sufficiently account for the intrinsically complex and value-laden political reality of benefit package design.

Methods: Several years ago, evidence-informed deliberative processes (EDPs) were developed to address this issue. An EDP is a practical and stepwise approach for HTA bodies to enhance legitimate health benefit package design based on deliberation between stakeholders to identify, reflect and learn about the meaning and importance of values, and to interpret available evidence on these values. We further developed the conceptual framework and initial 2019 guidance based on academic knowledge exchange, analysing practices of HTA bodies, surveying HTA bodies and experts around the globe, and implementation of EDPs in several countries around the world.

Results: EDPs stem from the general concept of legitimacy, which is translated into four elements - stakeholder involvement ideally operationalised through stakeholder participation with deliberation; evidence-informed evaluation; transparency; and appeal. The 2021 practical guidance distinguishes six practical steps of a HTA process and provides recommendations on how these elements can be implemented in each of these steps.

Conclusion: There is an increased attention for legitimacy, deliberative processes for HTA and health benefit package design, but the development of theories and methods for such processes remain behind. The added value of EDPs lies in the operationalisation of the general concept of legitimacy into practical guidance for HTA bodies.

Keywords: Evidence-Informed Deliberative Processes; Health Benefit Package; Health Technology Assessment; Legitimacy; Stakeholder Involvement; Universal Health Coverage.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 2
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment in

References

    1. Chalkidou K, Glassman A, Marten R, et al. Priority-setting for achieving universal health coverage. Bull World Health Organ. 2016;94(6):462–467. doi: 10.2471/blt.15.155721. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Verguet S, Hailu A, Eregata GT, Memirie ST, Johansson KA, Norheim OF. Toward universal health coverage in the post-COVID-19 era. Nat Med. 2021;27(3):380–387. doi: 10.1038/s41591-021-01268-y. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Glassman A, Giedion U, Smith PC. What’s In, What’s Out: Designing Benefits for Universal Health Coverage. Washington, DC, United States: Brookings Institution Press, Center for Global Development; 2017.
    1. World Health Organization (WHO). Global Survey on Health Technology Assessment by National Authorities. WHO; 2015.
    1. Holm S. The second phase of priority setting Goodbye to the simple solutions: the second phase of priority setting in health care. BMJ. 1998;317(7164):1000–1002. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources