Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Dec 2:9:748307.
doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.748307. eCollection 2021.

Virtual Coaching for Rehabilitation: The Participatory Design Experience of the vCare Project

Affiliations

Virtual Coaching for Rehabilitation: The Participatory Design Experience of the vCare Project

Agnese Seregni et al. Front Public Health. .

Abstract

End-user involvement constitutes an essential goal during the development of innovative solution, not only for the evaluation, but also in codesign, following a user-centered strategy. Indeed, it is a great asset of research to base the work in a user-centered approach, because it allows to build a platform that will respond to the real needs of users. The aims of this work are to present the methodology adopted to involve end-users (i.e., neurological patients, healthy elderly, and health professionals) in the evaluation of a novel virtual coaching system based on the personalized clinical pathways and to present the results obtained from these preliminary activities. Specific activities involving end-users were planned along the development phases and are referred to as participatory design. The user experience of participatory design is constituted by the two different phases: the "end-user's perspective" phase where the user involvement in experiential activities is from an observational point of view, whereas the "field study" phase is the direct participation in these activities. Evaluation tools (i.e., scales, questionnaires, and interviews) were planned to assess different aspects of the system. Thirty patients [14 with poststroke condition and 16 with Parkinson's disease (PD)], 13 healthy elderly, and six health professionals were enrolled from two clinical centers during the two phases of participatory design. Results from "end-user's perspective" phase showed globally a positive preliminary perception of the service. Overall, a positive evaluation (i.e., UEQ median score > 1) was obtained for each domain of the scale in both groups of patients and healthy subjects. The evaluation of the vCare system during the "field study" phase was assessed as excellent (>80 points) from the point of view of both patients and health professionals. According to the majority of patients, the rehabilitation service through the solution was reported to be interesting, engaging, entertaining, challenging and useful for improving impaired motor functions, and making patients aware of their cognitive abilities. Once refined and fine-tuned in the aspects highlighted in the this work, the system will be clinically tested at user's home to measure the real impact of the rehabilitative coaching services.

Keywords: Parkinson's disease; rehabilitation; stroke; usability and user experience; user-centered design; virtual coaching.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Participatory design concept in the vCare project along the phases of system evaluation.
Figure 2
Figure 2
UEQ scores for each domain of the scale. Distributions are composed by the mean UEQ score in the domain for each subject. (A) comparison between the overall group of patients (P) and healthy subjects (HS), (B) comparison among the two targeted pathologies [i.e., stroke (S) and PD] and healthy subjects (HS) for each domain of the scale. Statistically significant difference with p < 0.05 is marked with *.
Figure 3
Figure 3
SUS scores, mean and SD. (A) comparison between the overall group of patients (P) and healthcare professionals (HP), (B) comparison among HP related to the two clinical domains [i.e., stroke (HPS) at CCP, PD (HPPD) at OSA], (C) comparison among the two targeted pathologies (i.e., stroke (S), PD) related to motor (first two bars) and cognitive (last two bars) activities provided by virtual coaching.

References

    1. Tropea P, Schlieter H, Sterpi I, Judica E, Gand K, Caprino M, et al. . Rehabilitation, the great absentee of virtual coaching in medical care: scoping review. J Med Internet Res. (2019) 21:e12805. 10.2196/12805 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gavarkovs AG. Behavioral counseling training for primary care providers: immersive virtual simulation as a training tool. Front Public Health. (2019) 7:116. 10.3389/fpubh.2019.00116 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kyriazakos S, Schlieter H, Gand K, Caprino M, Corbo M, Tropea P, et al. . A novel virtual coaching system based on personalized clinical pathways for rehabilitation of older adults—requirements and implementation plan of the vCare project. Front Digital Health. (2020) 2:17. 10.3389/fdgth.2020.546562 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Miranda-Castillo C, Woods B, Orrell M. The needs of people with dementia living at home from user, caregiver and professional perspectives: a cross-sectional survey. BMC Health Serv Res. (2013) 13:43. 10.1186/1472-6963-13-43 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. van Boekel LC, Wouters EJM, Grimberg BM, van der Meer NJM, Luijkx KG. Perspectives of stakeholders on technology use in the care of community-living older adults with dementia: a systematic literature review. Healthcare. (2019) 7:73. 10.3390/healthcare7020073 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources