Whole Brain Irradiation or Stereotactic RadioSurgery for five or more brain metastases (WHOBI-STER): A prospective comparative study of neurocognitive outcomes, level of autonomy in daily activities and quality of life
- PMID: 34926839
- PMCID: PMC8649107
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2021.11.008
Whole Brain Irradiation or Stereotactic RadioSurgery for five or more brain metastases (WHOBI-STER): A prospective comparative study of neurocognitive outcomes, level of autonomy in daily activities and quality of life
Abstract
Aims: To evaluate neurocognitive performance, daily activity and quality of life (QoL), other than usual oncologic outcomes, among patients with brain metastasis ≥5 (MBM) from solid tumors treated with Stereotactic Brain Irradiation (SBI) or Whole Brain Irradiation (WBI).
Methods: This multicentric randomized controlled trial will involve the enrollment of 100 patients (50 for each arm) with MBM ≥ 5, age ≥ 18 years, Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) ≥ 70, life expectancy > 3 months, known primary tumor, with controlled or controllable extracranial disease, baseline Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) score ≥ 20/30, Barthel Activities of Daily Living score ≥ 90/100, to be submitted to SBI by LINAC with monoisocentric technique and non-coplanar arcs (experimental arm) or to WBI (control arm). The primary endpoints are neurocognitive performance, QoL and autonomy in daily-life activities variations, the first one assessed by MoCa Score and Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised, the second one through the EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL and QLQ-BN-20 questionnaires, the third one through the Barthel Index, respectively. The secondary endpoints are time to intracranial failure, overall survival, retreatment rate, acute and late toxicities, changing of KPS. It will be considered significant a statistical difference of at least 30% between the two arms (statistical power of 80% with a significance level of 95%).
Discussion: Several studies debate what is the decisive factor accountable for the development of neurocognitive decay among patients undergoing brain irradiation for MBM: radiation effect on clinically healthy brain tissue or intracranial tumor burden? The answer to this question may come from the recent technological advancement that allows, in a context of a significant time saving, improved patient comfort and minimizing radiation dose to off-target brain, a selective treatment of MBM simultaneously, otherwise attackable only by WBI. The achievement of a local control rate comparable to that obtained with WBI remains the fundamental prerequisite.
Trial registration: NCT number: NCT04891471.
Keywords: 3D-CRT, 3Dimensional-ConformalRadioTherapy; Autonomy in daily activities; BSC, Best Supportive Care; Brain metastases; CRF, Case Report Form; CT, Computerized Tomography; CTV, Clinical Target Volume; EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL, European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 15 for Palliative Care; FSRT, Fractionated Stereotactic Radiation Therapy; GTV, Gross Tumor Volume; KPS, Karnofsky Performance Status; LINAC, Linear Accelerator; MBM, Multiple Brain Metastastes; MRI, Magnetic Resonance Imaging; MoCA, Montreal Cognitive Assessment; NCCN, National Comprehensive Cancer Network; Neurocognitive decay; Neurocognitive performance; Neurocognitive tests; OAR, Organ At Risk; OS, Overall Survival; PTV, Planning Target Volume; Palliative care; QLQ-BN20, Quality of Life Questionnaire - Brain Neoplasm 20; QoL, Quality of Life; Quality of life; RT, Radiation Therapy; RTOG, Radiation Therapy Oncology Group; Radiotherapy for multiple brain metastases; SBI, Stereotactic Brain Irradiation; SRS, Stereotactic RadioSurgery; SRT, Stereotactic Radiation Therapy; Stereotactic Brain RadioSurgery; Stereotactic Brain Radiotherapy; Supportive care in cancer patients; VEGF, Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor; Whole Brain Radiotherapy.
© 2021 The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Figures
References
-
- DeAngelis L.M., Mandell L.R., Thaler H.T., Kimmel D.W., Galicich J.H., Fuks Z., et al. The role of postoperative radiotherapy after resection of single brain metastases. Neurosurgery. 1989;24(6):798–805. PubMed PMID: 2473409. - PubMed
-
- Kocher M., Soffietti R., Abacioglu U., Villà S., Fauchon F., Baumert B.G., et al. Adjuvant whole-brain radiotherapy versus observation after radiosurgery or surgical resection of one to three cerebral metastases: results of the EORTC 22952-26001 study. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(2):134–141. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.30.1655. Epub 2010 Nov 1. PubMed PMID: 21041710; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3058272. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Brown P.D., Jaeckle K., Ballman K.V., Farace E., Cerhan J.H., Anderson S.K., et al. Effect of radiosurgery alone vs radiosurgery with whole brain radiation therapy on cognitive function in patients with 1 to 3 brain metastases: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2016;316(4):401. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.9839. Erratum in: JAMA. 2018 Aug 7;320(5):510. PubMed PMID: 27458945; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5313044. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Soffietti R., Kocher M., Abacioglu U.M., Villa S., Fauchon F., Baumert B.G., et al. A European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer phase III trial of adjuvant whole-brain radiotherapy versus observation in patients with one to three brain metastases from solid tumors after surgical resection or radiosurgery: quality-of-life results. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31(1):65–72. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.41.0639. Epub 2012 Dec 3. PubMed PMID: 23213105. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Li J., Bentzen S.M., Renschler M., Mehta M.P. Regression after whole-brain radiation therapy for brain metastases correlates with survival and improved neurocognitive function. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25(10):1260–1266. PubMed PMID:17401015. - PubMed
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials