Ethical, Legal and Social Issues of Digital Phenotyping as a Future Solution for Present-Day Challenges: A Scoping Review
- PMID: 34928438
- PMCID: PMC8686352
- DOI: 10.1007/s11948-021-00354-1
Ethical, Legal and Social Issues of Digital Phenotyping as a Future Solution for Present-Day Challenges: A Scoping Review
Abstract
Digital phenotyping represents an avenue of consideration in patients' self-management. This scoping review aims to explore the trends in the body of literature on ethical, legal, and social challenges relevant to the implementation of digital phenotyping technologies in healthcare. The study followed the PRISMA-ScR methodology (Tricco et al. in Ann Int Med 169(7):467-473, 2018. https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-0850 ). The review systematically identified relevant literature, characterised the discussed technology, explored its impacts and the proposed solutions to identified challenges. Overall, the literature, perhaps unsurprisingly, concentrates on technical rather than ethical, legal, and social perspectives, which limits understanding of the more complex cultural and social factors in which digital phenotyping technologies are embedded. ELS issues mostly concern privacy, security, consent, lack of regulation, and issues of adoptability, and seldom expand to more complex ethical issues. Trust was chosen as an umbrella theme of a continuum of major ELS and technical issues. Sustained critical analysis of digital phenotyping showed to be sparse and geographically exclusive. There is a continuum and overlap between ELS issues, suggesting the need for a holistic, interdisciplinary approach to each of the challenges posed by the various technologies of digital phenotyping.
Keywords: Digital health, healthcare, health policy; Digital law; Digital phenotyping; ELSI; Embedded ethics.
© 2021. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures
References
-
- Ajana, B. (2018). Communal self-tracking: Data philanthropy, solidarity and privacy. In Self-tracking (pp. 125–141). Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978-3-319-65379-2_9
-
- Albrechtslund A. Online social networking as participatory surveillance. First Monday. 2008 doi: 10.5210/fm.v13i3.2142. - DOI
-
- Choat, S (2017) Tuition fees and the neoliberal university: Responding to the 2017 Higher Education and Research Act. Renewal 25(3–4). Available at: http://www.renewal.org.uk/articles/tuition-fees-and-the-neoliberal-unive.... Accessed 23 February 2021
-
- Christidou V, Dimopoulos K, Koulaidis V. Constructing social representations of science and technology: The role of metaphors in the press and the popular scientific magazines. Public Understanding of Science. 2004;13(4):347–362. doi: 10.1177/0963662504044108. - DOI
-
- Cooper I, Yon J. Ethical issues in biometrics. Science Insigts. 2019;30(2):63–69. doi: 10.15354/si.19.re095. - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
