Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2021 Jan-Dec:27:10760296211051704.
doi: 10.1177/10760296211051704.

Prediction Model of in-Hospital Venous Thromboembolism in Chinese Adult Patients after Hernia Surgery: The CHAT Score

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Prediction Model of in-Hospital Venous Thromboembolism in Chinese Adult Patients after Hernia Surgery: The CHAT Score

Zhi-Chun Gu et al. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2021 Jan-Dec.

Abstract

Background: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) events after hernia surgery influence prognosis and life quality and may be preventable. This study aimed to develop a useful model for predicting in-hospital VTE in Chinese patients after hernia surgery.

Methods: Patients after hernia surgery were retrospectively recruited from 58 institutions (n = 14 322). Totally, 36 potential predictors were involved in the regression analysis. Weighted points were assigned to the predictors of in-hospital VTE identified in the multivariate logistic regression analysis and a prediction model was established. Decision curve analysis was performed to evaluate the net clinical benefit between the established and Caprini models.

Results: A total of 11 707 patients were included and five variables were explored as predictors related to in-hospital VTE: varicose veins of lower extremity, history of VTE, family history of thrombosis, interruption of antithrombotic agents, and reducible hernia. The prediction model (the CHAT score) revealed a good performance metrics (c-statistic, 0.81 [95% CI, 0.80 to 0.81]; Nagelkerke R2, 0.27 [95% CI, 0.26 to 0.30]; Brier score, 0.16 [95% CI, 0.13 to 0.23]). The rate of in-hospital VTE after hernia surgery at low-risk (-4 points), intermediate-risk (0-1 points), high-risk (4 points) and very high-risk (≥5 points) were 0.05%, 0.39%, 0.73% and 8.62%, respectively. The CHAT score identified a considerable variability (from 0.05% to 8.62%) for in-hospital VTE among the overall population after hernia surgery. Decision curve analysis found a superior net benefit of the established model than the Caprini score.

Conclusions: The CHAT score is likely to be a practical 5-item supporting tool to identify patients at high risk of in-hospital VTE after hernia surgery that might assist in decision making and VTE prevention. Further validated study will strengthen this finding.

Keywords: Caprini score; inguinal hernia; prediction model; risk classification; venous thromboembolism.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Conflicting Interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Decision curve analysis of the CHAT score and Caprini score for in-hospital VTE after hernia surgery. The result showed a threshold to define in-hospital VTE risk >0.05% using the CHAT score. The horizontal red line represents the assumption that no patient will suffer the event, and the solid blue line represents the assumption that all patients will suffer the event.

References

    1. Suguita FY, Essu FF, Oliveira LT, et al. Learning curve takes 65 repetitions of totally extraperitoneal laparoscopy on inguinal hernias for reduction of operating time and complications. Surg Endosc 2017;31(10):3939–3945. doi:10.1007/s00464-017-5426-z - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lomnicki J, Leszko A, Kulis D, et al.. Current treatment of the inguinal hernia—the role of the totally extraperitoneal (TEP) hernia repair. Folia Med Cracov 2018;58(3):103–114. doi:10.24425/fmc.2018.125076 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Olavarria OA, Bernardi K, Shah SK, et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: multicenter, blinded randomized controlled trial. Br Med J. 2020;370:m2457. doi:10.1136/bmj.m2457 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Prabhu AS, Carbonell A, Hope W, et al. Robotic inguinal versus transabdominal laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: the RIVAL randomized clinical trial. JAMA Surg. 2020;155(5):380–387. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2020.0034 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Humes DJ, Abdul-Sultan A, Walker AJ, et al. Duration and magnitude of postoperative risk of venous thromboembolism after planned inguinal hernia repair in men: a population-based cohort study. Hernia: J Hernias Abdom Wall Surg. 2018;22(3):447–453. doi:10.1007/s10029-017-1716-6 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms