Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Dec 20;24(1):15.
doi: 10.1208/s12248-021-00671-0.

Assessment of Functional Characterization and Comparability of Biotherapeutics: a Review

Affiliations
Review

Assessment of Functional Characterization and Comparability of Biotherapeutics: a Review

Rozaleen Dash et al. AAPS J. .

Abstract

The development of monoclonal antibody (mAb) biosimilars is a complex process. The key to their successful development and commercialization is an in-depth understanding of the key product attributes that impact safety and efficacy and the strategies to control them. Functional assessment of mAb is a crucial part of the comparability of biopharmaceutical drugs. The development of a relevant and robust functional assay requires an interdisciplinary approach and sufficient flexibility to balance regulatory concerns as well as dynamics and variability during the manufacturing process. Although many advanced tools are available to study and compare the potency and bioactivity of the protein, most of these techniques suffer from major shortcomings that limit their routine use. These include the complexity of the task, establishment of the relevance of the chosen method with the mechanism of action (MOA) of the biosimilar, cost and extended time of analysis, and often the ambiguity in interpretation of the resulting data. To overcome or to address these challenges, the use of multiple orthogonal state-of-the-art techniques is a necessary prerequisite.

Keywords: cell-based assay; critical quality attributes (CQAs); functional comparability; ligand binding assay; mechanism of action (MOA).

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Rathore AS, Chirmule N, Malani H. Reimagining affordable biosimilars. BioPharm Int. 2020;33(10):16–22.
    1. Rathore AS, Bhargava A. Biosimilars in developed economies: overview, status, and regulatory considerations. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. Academic Press. 2020;110:104525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2019.104525 . - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tsuruta LR. Lopes dos Santos M, Moro AM. Biosimilars advancements: moving on to the future. Biotechnol Prog. 2015;31(5):1139–49. https://doi.org/10.1002/btpr.2066 . - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Frapaise FX. The end of phase 3 clinical trials in biosimilars development? BioDrugs. 2018;32(4):319–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40259-018-0287-0 . - DOI - PubMed
    1. Berkowitz SA, Engen JR, Mazzeo JR, Jones GB. Analytical tools for characterizing biopharmaceuticals and the implications for biosimilars. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2012;11(7):527–40. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrd3746 . - DOI - PubMed - PMC

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources