A Comparison of the Use of Smart Devices, Apps, and Social Media Between Adults With and Without Hearing Impairment: Cross-sectional Web-Based Study
- PMID: 34932013
- PMCID: PMC8726052
- DOI: 10.2196/27599
A Comparison of the Use of Smart Devices, Apps, and Social Media Between Adults With and Without Hearing Impairment: Cross-sectional Web-Based Study
Abstract
Background: eHealth and social media could be of particular benefit to adults with hearing impairment, but it is unknown whether their use of smart devices, apps, and social media is similar to that of the general population.
Objective: Our aim is to study whether adults with normal hearing and those with impaired hearing differ in their weekly use of smart devices, apps, and social media; reasons for using social media; and benefits from using social media.
Methods: We used data from a Dutch cohort, the National Longitudinal Study on Hearing. Data were collected from September 2016 to April 2020 using a web-based questionnaire and speech-in-noise test. The results from this test were used to categorize normal hearing and hearing impairment. Outcomes were compared using (multiple) logistic regression models.
Results: Adults with impaired hearing (n=384) did not differ from normal hearing adults (n=341) in their use of a smartphone or tablet. They were less likely to make use of social media apps on a smartphone, tablet, or smartwatch (age-adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.67, 95% CI 0.48-0.92; P=.02). Use of social media on all devices and use of other apps did not differ. Adults with hearing impairment were more likely to agree with using social media to stay in touch with family members (OR 1.54, 95% CI 1.16-2.07; P=.003) and friends (age-adjusted OR 1.35, 95% CI 1.01-1.81; P=.046). Furthermore, they were more likely to agree with using social media to perform their work (age-adjusted OR 1.51, 95% CI 1.04-2.18; P=.03). There were no differences in the experienced benefits from social media.
Conclusions: The potential for eHealth is confirmed because adults with hearing impairment are not less likely to use smart devices than their normal hearing peers. Adults with hearing impairment are less likely to use social media apps on a smart device but not less likely to use social media on all types of internet-connected devices. This warrants further research on the types of social media platforms that adults with hearing impairment use and on the type of device on which they prefer to use social media. Given that participants with hearing impairment are more likely than their normal hearing peers to use social media to perform their work, use of social media may be seen as an opportunity to enhance vocational rehabilitation services for persons with hearing impairment.
Keywords: app use; benefits from social media; eHealth; hearing impairment; mobile phone; social media use.
©Marieke F van Wier, Emily Urry, Birgit I Lissenberg-Witte, Sophia E Kramer. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (https://www.jmir.org), 20.12.2021.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of Interest: EU is affiliated with Sonova AG, the funder of this study.
Similar articles
-
Mobile Phone Ownership, Health Apps, and Tablet Use in US Adults With a Self-Reported History of Hypertension: Cross-Sectional Study.JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Jan 14;7(1):e12228. doi: 10.2196/12228. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019. PMID: 31344667 Free PMC article.
-
Using smartphone technology to support the adult audiologic rehabilitation journey.Int J Audiol. 2021 Apr;60(sup1):S61-S67. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2020.1854483. Epub 2020 Dec 3. Int J Audiol. 2021. PMID: 33269631
-
Smartphone, Social Media, and Mental Health App Use in an Acute Transdiagnostic Psychiatric Sample.JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Jun 7;7(6):e13364. doi: 10.2196/13364. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019. PMID: 31199338 Free PMC article.
-
Smartphone-Based Applications to Detect Hearing Loss: A Review of Current Technology.J Am Geriatr Soc. 2021 Feb;69(2):307-316. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16985. Epub 2020 Dec 29. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2021. PMID: 33341098 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Addictive Features of Social Media/Messenger Platforms and Freemium Games against the Background of Psychological and Economic Theories.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Jul 23;16(14):2612. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16142612. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019. PMID: 31340426 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Can Digital Communication Protect Against Depression for Older Adults With Hearing and Vision Impairment During COVID-19?J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2023 Apr 1;78(4):629-638. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbac193. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2023. PMID: 36512652 Free PMC article.
-
Cohort profile: Netherlands Longitudinal Study on Hearing (NL-SH).BMJ Open. 2023 Apr 17;13(4):e070180. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070180. BMJ Open. 2023. PMID: 37068904 Free PMC article.
References
-
- World Health Organization . Addressing the rising prevalence of hearing loss. Geneva: World Health Organisation; 2018. pp. 1–28.
-
- Homans NC, Metselaar RM, Dingemanse JG, van der Schroeff MP, Brocaar MP, Wieringa MH, de Jong RJ, Hofman A, Goedegebure A. Prevalence of age-related hearing loss, including sex differences, in older adults in a large cohort study. Laryngoscope. 2017 Mar;127(3):725–30. doi: 10.1002/lary.26150. - DOI - PubMed
-
- van der Meijden W, Panneman M, Kloet S, Blatter B, Homans N, Goedegebure A. VeiligheidNL, Kenniscentrum Letselpreventie. VeiligheidNL; 2020. [2021-11-17]. Prevalentie van gehoorverlies in Nederland. https://www.veiligheid.nl/.ibmmodres/domino/OpenAttachment/veiligheid/we... .
-
- Hunsaker A, Hargittai E. A review of Internet use among older adults. New Media Society. 2018 Jul 16;20(10):3937–54. doi: 10.1177/1461444818787348. - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous