Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2022 Mar 1;40(7):762-771.
doi: 10.1200/JCO.21.02067. Epub 2021 Dec 21.

Dual PD-1 and CTLA-4 Checkpoint Blockade Using Balstilimab and Zalifrelimab Combination as Second-Line Treatment for Advanced Cervical Cancer: An Open-Label Phase II Study

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Dual PD-1 and CTLA-4 Checkpoint Blockade Using Balstilimab and Zalifrelimab Combination as Second-Line Treatment for Advanced Cervical Cancer: An Open-Label Phase II Study

David M O'Malley et al. J Clin Oncol. .

Abstract

Purpose: Balstilimab (antiprogrammed death-1) and zalifrelimab (anticytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen-4) are two new checkpoint inhibitors emerging as promising investigational agents for the treatment of advanced cervical cancer. This phase II trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03495882) evaluated the combination of balstilimab plus zalifrelimab in patients with recurrent and/or metastatic cervical cancer who relapsed after prior platinum-based therapy.

Patients and methods: Patients were intravenously dosed with balstilimab 3 mg/kg once every 2 weeks and zalifrelimab 1 mg/kg once every 6 weeks, for up to 24 months. The primary end point was objective response rate (ORR, RECIST version 1.1, assessed by independent central review). Secondary end points included duration of response, safety and tolerability, and survival.

Results: In total, 155 women (median age, 50 years [range, 24-76 years]) were enrolled and treated with balstilimab plus zalifrelimab; 125 patients had measurable disease at baseline and one prior line of platinum-based therapy in the advanced setting, and these patients constituted the efficacy-evaluable population. The median follow-up was 21 months. The confirmed ORR was 25.6% (95% CI, 18.8 to 33.9), including 10 complete responders and 22 partial responders, with median duration of response not reached (86.5%, 75.5%, and 64.2% at 6, 9, and 12 months, respectively). The ORRs were 32.8% and 9.1% in patients with programmed death ligand-1-positive and programmed death ligand-1-negative tumors, respectively. For patients with squamous cell carcinoma, the ORR was 32.6%. The overall disease control rate was 52% (95% CI, 43.3 to 60.6). Hypothyroidism (14.2%) and hyperthyroidism (7.1%) were the most common immune-mediated adverse events.

Conclusion: Promising and durable clinical activity, with favorable tolerability, was seen in this largest trial to date evaluating dual programmed death-1/cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen-4 blockade in patients with recurrent and/or metastatic cervical cancer. Further investigation of the balstilimab and zalifrelimab combination in this setting is continuing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

David M. O'MalleyConsulting or Advisory Role: Janssen Oncology, AstraZeneca, Clovis Oncology, Tesaro, Novocure, AbbVie, Genentech/Roche, OncoQuest, Immunogen, GOG Foundation, Translational Genomics Research Institute, Agenus, Marker Therapeutics, Eisai, Genelux, Iovance Biotherapeutics, Ambry Genetics, Tarveda Therapeutics, Leap Therapeutics, Myriad Genetics, GlaxoSmithKline, Regeneron, Sorrento Therapeutics, Rubius Therapeutics, Elevar Therapeutics¸ Novartis, Seattle Genetics, BBI Healthcare, Arquer Diagnostics¸ Toray Medical, Takeda, InxMed, Celsion, Roche Diagnostics MSAResearch Funding: Amgen (Inst), AstraZeneca (Inst), Genentech/Roche (Inst), Regeneron (Inst), Immunogen (Inst), Janssen Research & Development (Inst), Clovis Oncology (Inst), EMD Serono (Inst), Ergomed (Inst), Ajinomoto (Inst), Immunogen (Inst), Cerulean Pharma (Inst), PharmaMar (Inst), Array BioPharma (Inst), Bristol Myers Squibb (Inst), Agenus (Inst), Tesaro (Inst), TRACON Pharma (Inst), Genmab (Inst), Seattle Genetics (Inst), Iovance Biotherapeutics (Inst), Merck (Inst), AbbVie/Stemcentrx (Inst), AbbVie (Inst), Mersana (Inst), Eisai (Inst), BBI Healthcare (Inst), Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma Oncology (Inst), Bradley J. MonkLeadership: US OncologyHonoraria: AbbVie, Advaxis, Agenus, Akeso Biopharma, Amgen, Aravive, AstraZeneca, Asymmetric Therapeutics, Boston Biomedical, ChemoID, Clovis Oncology, Deciphera Pharmaceuticals, Eisai¸ Geistlich Pharma, Genmab/Seattle Genetics, ImmunoGen, Immunomedics, Incyte, Iovance Biotherapeutics, Laekna Health Care, Mersana, Merck, Myriad Pharmaceuticals, NuCana, OncoMed, OncoQuest, OncoSec, Perthera, Pfizer, Puma Biotechnology, Regeneron, Roche/Genentech, Senti Biosciences, Takeda, Tarveda Therapeutics, Tesaro/GSK, Vavotar Life Sciences, Vascular Biogenics, Vigeo Therapeutics, GOG Foundation, Starton Therapeutics, Elevar Therapeutics, Novocure, Iovance Biotherapeutics, Gradalis, Karyopharm TherapeuticsConsulting or Advisory Role: AbbVie, Advaxis, Agenus, Akeso Biopharma, Amgen, Aravive, AstraZeneca, Asymmetric Therapeutics, Boston Biomedical, ChemoID, Clovis Oncology, Deciphera Pharmaceuticals, Eisai¸ Geistlich Pharma, Genmab/Seattle Genetics, GOG Foundation, ImmunoGen, Immunomedics, Iovance Biotherapeutics, Laekna Health Care, Mersana, Merck, Myriad Pharmaceuticals, NuCana, OncoMed, OncoQuest, OncoSec, Perthera, Pfizer, Puma Biotechnology, Regeneron, Roche/Genentech, Senti Biosciences, Takeda, Tarveda Therapeutics, Tesaro/GSK, Vavotar Life Sciences, Vascular Biogenics, Vigeo Therapeutics, Gradalis, Karyopharm Therapeutics, Sorrento Therapeutics, Novocure, ChemocareSpeakers' Bureau: Roche/Genentech, AstraZeneca, Clovis Oncology, Eisai, Tesaro/GSK, MerckResearch Funding: Amgen (Inst), Genentech (Inst), Lilly (Inst), Janssen (Inst), Array BioPharma (Inst), Tesaro (Inst), Morphotek (Inst), Pfizer (Inst), Advaxis (Inst), AstraZeneca (Inst), ImmunoGen (Inst), Regeneron (Inst), NuCana (Inst) Marilyn HuangConsulting or Advisory Role: Tesaro, Seattle Genetics, Aptitude Health, Agenus, Cooper Surgical, touchExpert opinionsResearch Funding: Merck (Inst) Tarek M. MeniawyHonoraria: AstraZeneca/MedImmuneConsulting or Advisory Role: AstraZeneca/MedImmune, Novartis, GlaxoSmithKline, BMSResearch Funding: Bristol Myers Squibb (Inst), BeiGene (Inst), Incyte (Inst), AstraZeneca/MedImmune (Inst), Regeneron (Inst), Bayer (Inst), Merck Serono (Inst), Roche/Genentech (Inst)Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: BMS Waldo Ortuzar FeliuEmployment: AgenusStock and Other Ownership Interests: AgenusTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Agenus Marek AncukiewiczEmployment: Agenus, LFB Biotechnologies, Boston Scientific (I)Stock and Other Ownership Interests: Agenus, Boston Scientific (I) Iwona LugowskaHonoraria: Roche, Agen7s, MSD, AmgenResearch Funding: Roche (Inst), Novartis (Inst)Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Roche/GenentechNo other potential conflicts of interest were reported.

Figures

FIG 1.
FIG 1.
Antitumor activity of the balstilimab-zalifrelimab combination. (A) Maximum percentage change from baseline in the sum of tumor target lesion diameters according to RECIST, version 1.1. PD-L1 status is indicated by color coding of bars. (B) Kinetics of tumor burden over time presented as percentage change in RECIST sum in patients with confirmed responses to combination treatment. The dashed red line corresponds to the 30% decrease in tumor size. CR, complete response; PD-L1, programmed death ligand-1; PR, partial response.
FIG 2.
FIG 2.
CRs to balstilimab-zalifrelimab combination therapy. (A) Computed tomography scans shown for a 59-year-old patient who received her first dose of the combination on January 22, 2019. Target lesions at baseline were an external iliac lymph node lesion (16 mm) and bladder lesion (23 mm). The first documentation of CR was on April 7, 2020, after 10 cycles of treatment, with regression of both target lesions. The patient remained cancer free and completed the study after 24 months, per protocol. (B) Scans for a 58-year-old patient, initially dosed on December 30, 2019, showing complete clearance of a large paraspinal muscle target lesion (49 mm) on May 1, 2020, after three cycles of treatment. CR, complete response.
FIG 3.
FIG 3.
Kaplan-Meier estimates of survival outcomes in the efficacy population (n = 125). (A) PFS and (B) OS assessed by the independent review committee per RECIST v1.1. OS, overall survival; PFS, progression-free survival.
FIG A1.
FIG A1.
Patient enrollment and disposition. CRT, chemoradiotherapy; ITT, intent-to-treat. aPatients who received ≥ 1 dose of study treatment, with measurable disease at baseline, and had prior line of platinum-based treatment in the metastatic, persistent, or recurrent setting (per Independent Review Committee).

Comment in

References

    1. Arbyn M, Weiderpass E, Bruni L, et al. : Estimates of incidence and mortality of cervical cancer in 2018: A worldwide analysis. Lancet Glob Health 8:e191-e203, 2020 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Boussios S, Seraj E, Zarkavelis G, et al. : Management of patients with recurrent/advanced cervical cancer beyond first line platinum regimens: Where do we stand? A literature review. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 108:164-174, 2016 - PubMed
    1. Marth C, Landoni F, Mahner S, et al. : Cervical cancer: ESMO clinical Practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 28:iv72-iv83, 2017 - PubMed
    1. Minion LE, Tewari KS: Cervical cancer—State of the science: From angiogenesis blockade to checkpoint inhibition. Gynecol Oncol 148:609-621, 2018 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tewari KS, Sill MW, Long HJ, III, et al. : Improved survival with bevacizumab in advanced cervical cancer. N Engl J Med 370:734-743, 2014 - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data