Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Dec 21;16(12):e0261551.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261551. eCollection 2021.

Women's perceptions and experiences of reproductive coercion and abuse: a qualitative evidence synthesis

Affiliations

Women's perceptions and experiences of reproductive coercion and abuse: a qualitative evidence synthesis

Jessica E Moulton et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Background: Reproductive coercion and abuse is a major public health issue, with significant effects on the health and well-being of women. Reproductive coercion and abuse includes any form of behaviour that intentionally controls another person's reproductive choices. The aim of this qualitative evidence synthesis is to explore women's experiences of reproductive coercion and abuse globally, to broaden understanding of the different ways reproductive coercion and abuse is perpetrated, perceived and experienced across settings and socio-cultural contexts.

Method: We searched Medline, CINAHL and Embase for eligible studies from inception to 25th February 2021. Primary studies with a qualitative study design that focused on the experiences and perceptions of women who have encountered reproductive coercion and abuse were eligible for inclusion. Titles and abstracts, and full texts were screened by independent reviewers. We extracted data from included studies using a form designed for this synthesis and assessed methodological limitations using CASP. We used Thomas and Harden's thematic analysis approach to analyse and synthesise the evidence, and the GRADE-CERQual approach to assess confidence in review findings.

Results: We included 33 studies from twelve countries in South Asia, the Asia Pacific, North America, South America, Africa and Europe. Most studies used in-depth interviews and focus group discussions to discuss women's experiences of reproductive coercion and abuse. Reproductive coercion and abuse manifested in a range of behaviours including control of pregnancy outcome, pregnancy pressure or contraceptive sabotage. There were a range of reasons cited for reproductive coercion and abuse, including control of women, rigid gender roles, social inequalities and family pressure. Women's different responses to reproductive coercion and abuse included using covert contraception and feelings of distress, anger and trauma. Across contexts, perpetration and experiences of reproductive coercion and abuse were influenced by different factors including son preferences and social exclusion.

Conclusions: We reflect on the importance of socio-cultural factors in understanding the phenomenon of reproductive coercion and abuse and how it affects women, as well as how the mechanisms of power and control at both individual and societal levels work to perpetuate the incidence of reproductive coercion and abuse against women.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Study flow diagram.
This figure depicts the study inclusions and exclusions.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Reproductive coercion and abuse: From causes to consequences.
This figure depicts the organisation of the review findings using a logic model approach. Moving from left to right, we identify the reasons for reproductive coercion and abuse identified by women, women’s experiences of reproductive coercion and abuse, their reactions to reproductive coercion and abuse, and the short- and long-term outcomes of these experiences. Numbers in parenthesis show the connection to the review finding number.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Grace KT, Fleming C. A Systematic Review of Reproductive Coercion in International Settings. World Medical & Health Policy. 2016;8[4]:382–408. doi: 10.1002/wmh3.209 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Marie Stopes Australia. Hidden forces: Shining a light on reproductive coercion: White Paper. 2018.
    1. Moore AM, Frohwirth L, Miller E. Male reproductive control of women who have experienced intimate partner violence in the United States. Social Science & Medicine. 2010;70[11]:1737–44. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.02.009 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Miller E, Jordan B, Levenson R, Silverman JG, editors. Reproductive coercion: connecting the dots between partner violence and unintended pregnancy2010 2010; United States: Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lévesque S, Rousseau C. Young Women’s Acknowledgment of Reproductive Coercion: A Qualitative Analysis. Journal Of Interpersonal Violence. 2019:886260519842169-. doi: 10.1177/0886260519842169 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types