Women's perceptions and experiences of reproductive coercion and abuse: a qualitative evidence synthesis
- PMID: 34932570
- PMCID: PMC8691598
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261551
Women's perceptions and experiences of reproductive coercion and abuse: a qualitative evidence synthesis
Abstract
Background: Reproductive coercion and abuse is a major public health issue, with significant effects on the health and well-being of women. Reproductive coercion and abuse includes any form of behaviour that intentionally controls another person's reproductive choices. The aim of this qualitative evidence synthesis is to explore women's experiences of reproductive coercion and abuse globally, to broaden understanding of the different ways reproductive coercion and abuse is perpetrated, perceived and experienced across settings and socio-cultural contexts.
Method: We searched Medline, CINAHL and Embase for eligible studies from inception to 25th February 2021. Primary studies with a qualitative study design that focused on the experiences and perceptions of women who have encountered reproductive coercion and abuse were eligible for inclusion. Titles and abstracts, and full texts were screened by independent reviewers. We extracted data from included studies using a form designed for this synthesis and assessed methodological limitations using CASP. We used Thomas and Harden's thematic analysis approach to analyse and synthesise the evidence, and the GRADE-CERQual approach to assess confidence in review findings.
Results: We included 33 studies from twelve countries in South Asia, the Asia Pacific, North America, South America, Africa and Europe. Most studies used in-depth interviews and focus group discussions to discuss women's experiences of reproductive coercion and abuse. Reproductive coercion and abuse manifested in a range of behaviours including control of pregnancy outcome, pregnancy pressure or contraceptive sabotage. There were a range of reasons cited for reproductive coercion and abuse, including control of women, rigid gender roles, social inequalities and family pressure. Women's different responses to reproductive coercion and abuse included using covert contraception and feelings of distress, anger and trauma. Across contexts, perpetration and experiences of reproductive coercion and abuse were influenced by different factors including son preferences and social exclusion.
Conclusions: We reflect on the importance of socio-cultural factors in understanding the phenomenon of reproductive coercion and abuse and how it affects women, as well as how the mechanisms of power and control at both individual and societal levels work to perpetuate the incidence of reproductive coercion and abuse against women.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Women's and girls' experiences of reproductive coercion and opportunities for intervention in family planning clinics in Nairobi, Kenya: a qualitative study.Reprod Health. 2020 Jun 17;17(1):96. doi: 10.1186/s12978-020-00942-7. Reprod Health. 2020. PMID: 32552745 Free PMC article.
-
Men's reproductive coercion of women: prevalence, experiences, and coping strategies-a mixed method study in urban health facilities in León, Nicaragua.BMC Womens Health. 2021 Aug 23;21(1):310. doi: 10.1186/s12905-021-01441-y. BMC Womens Health. 2021. PMID: 34425798 Free PMC article.
-
Race and reproductive coercion: a qualitative assessment.Womens Health Issues. 2015 May-Jun;25(3):216-23. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2014.12.004. Epub 2015 Mar 5. Womens Health Issues. 2015. PMID: 25748823 Free PMC article.
-
Women's and girls' experiences of menstruation in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review and qualitative metasynthesis.PLoS Med. 2019 May 16;16(5):e1002803. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002803. eCollection 2019 May. PLoS Med. 2019. PMID: 31095568 Free PMC article.
-
Influences on reproductive decision-making among forcibly displaced women resettling in high-income countries: a scoping review and thematic analysis.Int J Equity Health. 2023 Sep 5;22(1):179. doi: 10.1186/s12939-023-01993-5. Int J Equity Health. 2023. PMID: 37670302 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
'It wasn't what I was suited for': regretful mothers negotiating their reproductive decision and mother role.Med Humanit. 2024 Feb 22;50(1):70-76. doi: 10.1136/medhum-2023-012717. Med Humanit. 2024. PMID: 37977805 Free PMC article.
-
Risk factors and health consequences of experiencing reproductive coercion: a scoping review protocol.BMJ Open. 2023 Oct 19;13(10):e073326. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-073326. BMJ Open. 2023. PMID: 37857548 Free PMC article.
-
Women's reproductive mental health: currently available evidence and future directions for research, clinical practice and health policy.World Psychiatry. 2025 Jun;24(2):196-215. doi: 10.1002/wps.21305. World Psychiatry. 2025. PMID: 40371748 Free PMC article.
-
Recent Intimate Partner Violence and Oral Contraceptive Pill Adherence in a Cohort of Reproductive-Aged Women.J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2022 Dec;31(12):1703-1709. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2021.0622. Epub 2022 Sep 20. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2022. PMID: 36126298 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Contraceptive method denial as downward contraceptive coercion: A mixed-methods mystery client study in Western Kenya.Contraception. 2022 Nov;115:53-58. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2022.06.014. Epub 2022 Jun 29. Contraception. 2022. PMID: 35779578 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Marie Stopes Australia. Hidden forces: Shining a light on reproductive coercion: White Paper. 2018.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources