Global, regional and national burden of low back pain 1990-2019: A systematic analysis of the Global Burden of Disease study 2019
- PMID: 34934626
- PMCID: PMC8639804
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jot.2021.07.005
Global, regional and national burden of low back pain 1990-2019: A systematic analysis of the Global Burden of Disease study 2019
Abstract
Background: To comprehensively analyze the global level and trends of prevalence, incidence and years lived with disability (YLDs) for low back pain (LBP) from 1990 to 2019 by age, sex and sociodemographic index (SDI).
Methods: Publicly available modelled data and methods were obtained from the Global Burden of Diseases (GBD) study 2019, and used to evaluate the global burden of LBP through a systematic analysis.
Results: Globally, the age-standardized prevalence, incidence and YLDs rate of LBP were slightly decreased from 1990 to 2019, but the number of the prevalent cases, incident cases and YLDs had substantially increased, and LBP remains the leading cause of YLDs in 2019 worldwide. The number of prevalent cases was increased with age and peaked at the age of 45-54 years for both sexes, and the global prevalence rate was higher in females than in males and increased with age, peaking at the 80-84 age group in both sexes in 2019. Overall, a positive association between the age-standardized YLD rate and SDI was observed over the past thirty years. At the national revel, the United States, Denmark and Switzerland had the three highest levels of age-standardized prevalence, while Zambia, Zimbabwe and Canada showed the highest increase in the age-standardized prevalence during 1990-2019.
Conclusions: LBP is a major public health issue globally, and its burden remains high. Increasing population awareness about its risk factors and preventive measures for LBP are needed to reduce the future burden of this condition.
The translational potential of this article: Due to the high prevalence and heavy burden of LBP globally, it is important to update its epidemiological data. This systematic analysis provides researchers and healthcare policy makers with up-to-date, comprehensive and comparable information on global LBP burden, which is of clinical translational significance.
Keywords: Epidemiological science; Global burden; Low back pain.
© 2021 The Authors.
Conflict of interest statement
None declared.
Figures





Similar articles
-
Global low back pain prevalence and years lived with disability from 1990 to 2017: estimates from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017.Ann Transl Med. 2020 Mar;8(6):299. doi: 10.21037/atm.2020.02.175. Ann Transl Med. 2020. PMID: 32355743 Free PMC article.
-
Global, Regional, and National Burden of Spine Pain, 1990-2019: A Systematic Analysis of the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019.Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2024 Mar;105(3):461-469. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2023.10.019. Epub 2023 Nov 11. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2024. PMID: 37956823
-
The burden of low back pain and its association with socio-demographic variables in the Middle East and North Africa region, 1990-2019.BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023 Jan 23;24(1):59. doi: 10.1186/s12891-023-06178-3. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023. PMID: 36683025 Free PMC article.
-
The global, regional, and national burden of pancreatitis in 195 countries and territories, 1990-2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017.BMC Med. 2020 Dec 10;18(1):388. doi: 10.1186/s12916-020-01859-5. BMC Med. 2020. PMID: 33298026 Free PMC article.
-
Global, regional, and national burden of 12 mental disorders in 204 countries and territories, 1990-2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019.Lancet Psychiatry. 2022 Feb;9(2):137-150. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(21)00395-3. Epub 2022 Jan 10. Lancet Psychiatry. 2022. PMID: 35026139 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Sociodemographic differences in low back pain: which subgroups of workers are most vulnerable?BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024 Oct 26;25(1):852. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-07970-5. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024. PMID: 39462332 Free PMC article.
-
Bone mineral density is not associated with incident high-intensity back pain: a 10-year cohort study in men.JBMR Plus. 2024 Jun 10;8(8):ziae076. doi: 10.1093/jbmrpl/ziae076. eCollection 2024 Aug. JBMR Plus. 2024. PMID: 38989260 Free PMC article.
-
How is recovery defined and measured in patients with low back pain? A mixed study systematic review.BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024 Oct 1;25(1):763. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-07892-2. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024. PMID: 39354445 Free PMC article.
-
Injectable hydrogel with nucleus pulposus-matched viscoelastic property prevents intervertebral disc degeneration.J Orthop Translat. 2022 Apr 1;33:162-173. doi: 10.1016/j.jot.2022.03.006. eCollection 2022 Mar. J Orthop Translat. 2022. PMID: 35415072 Free PMC article.
-
The Disease Burden of Primary Intracerebral Hemorrhage in Hunan Province, China in 2018.J Epidemiol Glob Health. 2022 Sep;12(3):267-273. doi: 10.1007/s44197-022-00045-5. Epub 2022 May 28. J Epidemiol Glob Health. 2022. PMID: 35633483 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Vlaeyen J.W.S., Maher C.G., Wiech K., Van Zundert J., Meloto C.B., Diatchenko L., et al. Low back pain. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2018;4:52. - PubMed
-
- Urits I., Burshtein A., Sharma M., Testa L., Gold P.A., Orhurhu V., et al. Low back pain, a comprehensive review: pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2019;23:23. - PubMed
-
- Hartvigsen J., Hancock M.J., Kongsted A., Louw Q., Ferreira M.L., Genevay S., et al. What low back pain is and why we need to pay attention. Lancet. 2018;391:2356–2367. - PubMed
-
- Maher C., Underwood M., Buchbinder R. Non-specific low back pain. Lancet. 2017;389:736–747. - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous