The impact of Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score on deceased donor liver transplant outcomes in low volume liver transplantation center: a retrospective and single-center study
- PMID: 34934763
- PMCID: PMC8651983
- DOI: 10.4174/astr.2021.101.6.360
The impact of Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score on deceased donor liver transplant outcomes in low volume liver transplantation center: a retrospective and single-center study
Abstract
Purpose: In June 2016, the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score was employed in South Korea instead of the Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) score. This study compared the outcomes of deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT) before and after the MELD system application.
Methods: This retrospective study reviewed 48 patients who underwent DDLT for end-stage liver disease at a single tertiary referral center between January 2014 and December 2018. The patients were categorized into the pre-MELD (22 patients) and post-MELD (26 patients) groups. The demographics, postoperative outcomes, and overall survival time were evaluated between the 2 groups.
Results: The 2 groups had no differences in age, sex, ABO type, etiology for liver transplantation, CTP-score, operation time, cold ischemic time, and amount of red blood cell transfusion, although their MELD score differed significantly (post-MELD group, 36.2 ± 4.9; pre-MELD group, 27.7 ± 11.8; P < 0.001). The post-MELD group has longer intensive care unit stay (11.2 ± 9.5 days vs. 5.7 ± 4.5 days, P = 0.018) and hospital stay than the pre-MELD group (36.8 ± 26 days vs. 22.8 ± 9.3 days, P = 0.016). The 1-year survival rate was lower in the post-MELD group (61.5% vs. 86.4%, P = 0.029).
Conclusion: After MELD allocation, patients with high MELD scores had increased DDLT and consequently required a longer recovery time, which could negatively affect survival. According to the experience of a small-volume center, these problems were related to both severe organ shortages in South Korea and MELD allocation.
Keywords: Alcoholic fatty liver; Liver cirrhosis; Liver transplantation; Model for End-Stage Liver Disease; Morbidity.
Copyright © 2021, the Korean Surgical Society.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of Interest: No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.
Figures
References
-
- Hong G, Lee KW, Suh S, Yoo T, Kim H, Park MS, et al. The model for end-stage liver disease score-based system predicts short term mortality better than the current Child-Turcotte-Pugh score-based allocation system during waiting for deceased liver transplantation. J Korean Med Sci. 2013;28:1207–1212. - PMC - PubMed
-
- Min SI, Ahn C, Han DJ, Kim SI, Chung SY, Lee SK, et al. To achieve national self-sufficiency: recent progresses in deceased donation in Korea. Transplantation. 2015;99:765–770. - PubMed
-
- Malinchoc M, Kamath PS, Gordon FD, Peine CJ, Rank J, ter Borg PC. A model to predict poor survival in patients undergoing transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts. Hepatology. 2000;31:864–871. - PubMed
-
- Kim MS. Modification of emergency status in deceased donor liver allocation: evidence for Korean Model of End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) system. J Korean Soc Transplant. 2016;30:51–58.
-
- Dutkowski P, Oberkofler CE, Béchir M, Müllhaupt B, Geier A, Raptis DA, et al. The model for end-stage liver disease allocation system for liver transplantation saves lives, but increases morbidity and cost: a prospective outcome analysis. Liver Transpl. 2011;17:674–684. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources