Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Dec 16;5(12):nzab128.
doi: 10.1093/cdn/nzab128. eCollection 2021 Dec.

Large State Variation in Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Purchases: What We Learn from the Beverage Industry Data

Tatiana Andreyeva  1
Affiliations

Large State Variation in Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Purchases: What We Learn from the Beverage Industry Data

Tatiana Andreyeva. Curr Dev Nutr. .

Abstract

Negative health consequences of excessive sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) consumption have prompted recommendations for SSB taxation to improve diet and health. Over 40 countries and 8 local US jurisdictions have implemented SSB taxes to date. There is considerable interest in state SSB taxes in the USA, but state-level data on SSB consumption levels is lacking. This article uses proprietary data from the Beverage Marketing Corporation on beverage sales across all US retail channels to estimate state-level per capita SSB purchases in 2021. There is considerable variation in per capita SSB purchases across states, from an estimated annual 23.5 gallons (89.1 L) in Hawaii to 51.8 gallons (196.1 L) in Missouri. Current average levels of SSB purchases at 13 ounces (0.38 L) daily leave little to no room for added sugars from all other sources. Policymakers in states with extra-high SSB purchases, especially in the Midwest, should consider effective evidence-based policies, including fiscal approaches, to increase awareness about SSB risks, encourage healthier beverage choices, and improve population diet.

Keywords: added sugars; cross-state differences; fiscal policy; sugar-sweetened beverages; taxation.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Reedy J, Krebs-Smith SM. Dietary sources of energy, solid fats, and added sugars among children and adolescents in the United States. J Am Diet Assoc. 2010;110(10):1477–84. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mesirow MS, Welsh JA. Changing beverage consumption patterns have resulted in fewer liquid calories in the diets of US children: national health and nutrition examination survey 2001–2010. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2015;115(4):559–66. - PubMed
    1. Bleich SN, Vercammen KA, Koma JW, Li Z. Trends in beverage consumption among children and adults, 2003–2014. Obesity. 2018;26(2):432–41. - PubMed
    1. Keybridge Public Policy Economics . 2020. 2025 Beverage Calories Initiative: reporton 2019 progress toward the National Calorie Goal. Rep., Keybridge, Washington, DC. [Internet]. Available from: https://keybridgedc.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/2025-Beverage-Calorie....
    1. US Department of Health and Human Services, U.S. Department of Agriculture . 2015–2020 Dietary Guidelines for Americans, Eighth Edition. Washington DC: U.S. Government Printing Office; 2015.

LinkOut - more resources