A propensity score-matched, real-world comparison of ustekinumab vs vedolizumab as a second-line treatment for Crohn's disease. The Cross Pennine study II
- PMID: 34935160
- PMCID: PMC9305775
- DOI: 10.1111/apt.16742
A propensity score-matched, real-world comparison of ustekinumab vs vedolizumab as a second-line treatment for Crohn's disease. The Cross Pennine study II
Abstract
Background: The optimal choice of biological agents after failure of anti-tumour-necrosis-factor-(TNF)α agent in Crohn's disease (CD) is yet to be defined.
Aims: To assess the effectiveness and safety of ustekinumab compared to vedolizumab as second-line treatment in CD patients who failed anti-TNFα therapy.
Methods: Retrospective analysis of clinical response and remission at 14 and 52 weeks to ustekinumab by physician global assessment (PGA). A propensity score-matched analysis with a cohort treated with vedolizumab was performed.
Results: Of 282 patients (mean age 40 ± 15, F:M ratio 1.7:1) treated with ustekinumab, clinical response or remission was reached by 200/282 patients (70.9%) at 14 weeks, and 162/259 patients (62.5%) at 52 weeks. Overall, 74 adverse events occurred, of which 26 were labelled as serious (8.3 per 100 person-year). After exclusion of patients without prior anti-TNFα exposure and patients previously exposed to vedolizumab or ustekinumab, we analysed 275/282 patients (97.5%) on ustekinumab and 118/135 patients (87.4%) on vedolizumab. Propensity score analysis revealed that at 14 weeks, patients treated with ustekinumab were 38% (95% CI 25%-50%; P < 0.001) more likely to achieve clinical remission, while at 52 weeks, the difference of 9% (95% CI -15% to 33%; P = 0.462) was not significant.
Conclusions: Ustekinumab was effective and well tolerated in this real-world cohort. While ustekinumab proved more effective at 14-weeks, we found no statistically significant differences at 52 weeks compared to vedolizumab.
© 2021 The Authors. Alimentary Pharmacology&Therapeutics published by John Wiley&Sons Ltd.
Figures
Comment in
-
Letter: potential selection bias in the real-world comparison of ustekinumab versus vedolizumab as a second-line treatment for Crohn's disease.Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2022 Apr;55(8):1069. doi: 10.1111/apt.16871. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2022. PMID: 35362122 No abstract available.
-
Letter: potential selection bias in real-world comparison of ustekinumab versus vedolizumab as a second-line treatment for Crohn's disease-authors' reply.Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2022 Apr;55(8):1070-1071. doi: 10.1111/apt.16896. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2022. PMID: 35362123 No abstract available.
References
-
- Roda G, Chien Ng S, Kotze PG, et al. Crohn’s disease. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2020;6:22. - PubMed
-
- Lenti MV, Di Sabatino A. Intestinal fibrosis. Mol Aspects Med. 2019;65:100–109. - PubMed
-
- Torres J, Bonovas S, Doherty G, et al. ECCO Guidelines on therapeutics in Crohn's disease: medical treatment. J Crohns Colitis. 2020;14:4–22. - PubMed
-
- Adamina M, Bonovas S, Raine T, et al. ECCO guidelines on therapeutics in Crohn's disease: surgical treatment. J Crohns Colitis. 2020;14:155–168. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical