Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1987 Apr;148(4):703-9.
doi: 10.2214/ajr.148.4.703.

MR imaging in the diagnosis of pancreatic disease

Comparative Study

MR imaging in the diagnosis of pancreatic disease

D Tscholakoff et al. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1987 Apr.

Abstract

MR imaging examinations of 20 patients with normal pancreas and of 38 patients with suspected pancreatic disease were analyzed retrospectively to evaluate the ability of MR imaging to depict the normal and abnormal pancreas, establish MR criteria for various pancreatic diseases, determine if MR imaging can distinguish among various pancreatic diseases, and compare the usefulness of MR imaging with CT. In all 20 patients with normal pancreas and in 34 of the 38 patients with suspected pancreatic disease excellent or good evaluation of the pancreas was achieved. A 0.35-T magnet (Diasonics MT/S) was used, and both T1- and T2-weighted images were needed. T1 and T2 relaxation times and MR signal intensities showed no specific pattern to allow consistent differentiation between normal and diseased pancreatic tissue or to distinguish between tumor and inflammation. In the 29 patients in whom MR and CT images could be compared, MR imaging and CT provided equivalent information in 20 (69%). In 4 patients (14%), MR imaging added information, and in 5 patients (17%) of cases, MR imaging yielded less information than CT. MR imaging of the pancreas was found to be superior to CT in selected instances, such as in the staging of pancreatic neoplasms (n = 4) and in the evaluation of pancreatic disease after surgery (n = 3). We conclude that, at present, MR imaging should not be used as the screening method for pancreatic disease but should be reserved as an adjunct when the information provided by CT is insufficient.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources