Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy Application in Fingertip Replantations and a Systematic Review
- PMID: 34936614
- DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000008628
Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy Application in Fingertip Replantations and a Systematic Review
Abstract
Background: Fingertip replantation is technically challenging. Venous congestion is one of the most common causes of replantation failure. Therefore, various venous drainage procedures and salvage techniques have been used in venous congestion. Negative-pressure wound therapy has proven beneficial in limb injuries, yet limited studies of fingertip replantation exist. This study aims to analyze risk factors in fingertip replantation and to evaluate the feasibility and clinical benefits of negative-pressure wound therapy compared with other salvage techniques.
Methods: From January of 2015 to December of 2019, 27 patients (27 digits) who experienced fingertip amputation over Tamai zone I or II underwent replantation. Salvage negative-pressure wound therapy was applied for venous congestion postoperatively. Replantation data were collected for further analysis.
Results: The overall survival rate of digit replantation with salvage negative-pressure wound therapy was 92.6 percent (25 of 27). The blood transfusion rate was 11.1 percent (three of 27). The average hospitalization time was 8.04 ± 1.43 days and the median duration of negative-pressure wound therapy was 6 days (range, 4 to 8 days; interquartile range, 2 days). There is no significant difference between the survival and failure groups for all risk factors evaluated.
Conclusion: Negative-pressure wound therapy is a simple and effective salvage option to relieve venous congestion in fingertip replantation with a satisfactory survival rate, low blood transfusion rate, and short inpatient stay.
Clinical question/level of evidence: Therapeutic, IV.
Copyright © 2021 by the American Society of Plastic Surgeons.
Similar articles
-
Serial stab incision venous drainage technique for simple artery-only fingertip replantation.J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2019 Jan-Apr;27(1):2309499019831480. doi: 10.1177/2309499019831480. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2019. PMID: 30827170
-
Reconstruction of circulation in the fingertip without vein repair in zone I replantation.J Hand Surg Am. 2008 Nov;33(9):1597-601. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2008.05.005. J Hand Surg Am. 2008. PMID: 18984343
-
Significance of venous anastomosis in fingertip replantation.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003 Mar;111(3):1151-8. doi: 10.1097/01.PRS.0000046497.88549.E0. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003. PMID: 12621185
-
Dorsal approach for vascular repairs in distal finger replantations.Microsurgery. 2016 Nov;36(8):628-636. doi: 10.1002/micr.30057. Epub 2016 Apr 9. Microsurgery. 2016. PMID: 27062183 Review.
-
Fingertip replantation.J Hand Surg Am. 2007 Apr;32(4):548-55. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2007.01.019. J Hand Surg Am. 2007. PMID: 17398367 Review.
Cited by
-
Negative Pressure Wound Therapy for Gas Gangrene of the Fingertip with Prolonged Infection.Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2024 May 1;12(5):e5782. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000005782. eCollection 2024 May. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2024. PMID: 38699285 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Barbary S, Dap F, Dautel G. Finger replantation: Surgical technique and indications. Chir Main. 2013;32:363–372.
-
- Hattori Y, Doi K, Ikeda K, Abe Y, Dhawan V. Significance of venous anastomosis in fingertip replantation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;111:1151–1158.
-
- Hahn HO, Jung SG. Results of replantation of amputated fingertips in 450 patients. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2006;22:407–413.
-
- Jazayeri L, Klausner JQ, Chang J. Distal digital replantation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;132:1207–1217.
-
- Sebastin SJ, Chung KC. A systematic review of the outcomes of replantation of distal digital amputation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;128:723–737.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials