Examining commonsense epidemiology: The case of asthma
- PMID: 34937417
- PMCID: PMC10849155
- DOI: 10.1177/13591053211064986
Examining commonsense epidemiology: The case of asthma
Abstract
Commonsense epidemiology-how lay people think about diseases and their causes and consequences-can influence how people respond. We examined three lay epidemiological beliefs about 20 triggers and 19 symptoms among 349 caregivers of children with asthma. Our findings contradicted the prevalence-seriousness hypothesis (perceived prevalence and seriousness correlate negatively). The data partially supported the prevalence-control hypothesis (perceived prevalence and asthma control correlate negatively). We found weak support for the seriousness-control hypothesis (perceived seriousness and asthma control correlate negatively). These findings suggest boundary conditions on the application of commonsense epidemiological beliefs.
Keywords: asthma caregivers; asthma control; asthma triggers and symptoms; childhood asthma; commonsense epidemiology.
References
-
- Bar-Lev S and Beimel D (2020) Commonsense epidemiology in the age of electronic patient records (EPR). In: Impacts of Information Technology on Patient Care and Empowerment. IGI Global, pp.343–364.
-
- duRivage N, Ross M and Mayne SL et al. (2017) Asthma control test: Comparing parent proxy with parent and child report for children 6 to 12 years. Clinical Pediatrics 56(4): 341–347. - PubMed
-
- Jemmott JB, Croyle RT, and Ditto PH (1988) Commonsense epidemiology: Self-based judgments from laypersons and physicians. Health Psychology 7(1): 55–73. - PubMed
-
- Jemmott JB, Ditto PH and Croyle RT (1986) Judging health status: effects of perceived prevalence and personal relevance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 50(5): 899–905. - PubMed
-
- Meyer D, Leventhal H and Gutmann M (1985) Common-sense models of illness: the example of hypertension. Health Psychology 4(2): 115–135. - PubMed
