Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Apr 1;54(4):683-691.
doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000002840.

The Rise of the Female Warfighter: Physiology, Performance, and Future Directions

Affiliations
Review

The Rise of the Female Warfighter: Physiology, Performance, and Future Directions

Gabrielle E W Giersch et al. Med Sci Sports Exerc. .

Abstract

Since 1948, the United States military has been open to both men and women as permanent party service members. However, in the majority of the time since, there have been a subset of military occupational specialties (MOS), or job descriptions, open only to men. In particular, jobs requiring more intense physical and/or environmental strain were considered to be beyond the physiological capabilities of women. In the present analysis, we review the literature regarding neuromuscular, physical performance, and environmental physiology in women, to highlight that women have no inherent limitation in their capacity to participate in relevant roles and jobs within the military, within accepted guidelines to promote risk mitigation across sexes. First, we discuss performance and injury risk: both neuromuscular function and physical capabilities. Second, physiological responses to environmental stress. Third, we discuss risk as it relates to reproductive health and nutritional considerations. We conclude with a summary of current physiological, performance, and injury risk data in men and women that support our overarching purpose, as well as suggestions for future directions.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. O’Connor B. [Internet]. Available from: https://www.army.mil/article/235994/forty_years_have_passed_since_the_fi... . June 1, 2021.
    1. Bobrick E, Manegold CS, Brodie LF. Arms and the woman. Womens Rev Books . 2000;17(9):8.
    1. Kimmel M. Saving the males: the sociological implications of the Virginia Military Institute and the Citadel. Gend Soc . 2000;14(4):494–516.
    1. Aspin L. Direct ground combat definition and assignment rule. Memorandum to the Secretary of the Army, Secretary of the Navy, Secretary of the Air Force, Chair of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Assistant Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness, and Assistant Secretary of Defense for Reserve Affairs, Washington, DC. 1994.
    1. Ministry of Defense. Report on the review of the exclusion of women from ground close-combat roles. 2010. Ministry of Defense. Available from: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploa... . Accessed May 16, 2021.

LinkOut - more resources