Comparison of the mean of the first two blood pressure readings with the overall mean of three readings on a single occasion
- PMID: 34939995
- DOI: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000003065
Comparison of the mean of the first two blood pressure readings with the overall mean of three readings on a single occasion
Abstract
Objective: Guidelines differed on the required number of blood pressure (BP) readings for accurate BP assessment. We, therefore, compared the mean of the first two BP readings with the overall mean of three readings in the diagnosis of hypertension.
Methods: BP was measured three times consecutively with a 1 min interval using a validated automated electronic BP monitor in volunteers aged at least 18 years. The mean of the first and second BP readings was compared with the mean of the three blood pressure readings for the diagnostic accuracy of hypertension.
Results: Of the 77 520 study participants, 65.2 and 25.2% had a SBP or DBP difference at least 5 mmHg and at least 10 mmHg between the first and second BP readings, respectively. Regardless whether the BP difference between the first two BP readings was at least 5 mmHg or at least 10 mmHg for systolic and diastolic alone or both, significant (P < 0.0001) SBP/DBP differences between the mean of the first two BP readings and the overall mean of three readings were observed with an absolute value up to 1.28/1.11 mmHg. However, the mean of the first two BP readings exhibited good reliability and sufficient agreement in the diagnosis of hypertension with a kappa statistic at least 0.88, except that the difference between the first and second BP readings was at least 10 mmHg for both systolic and diastolic (κ=0.79). The diagnostic accuracy was similar across age quartile, sex, and BP category.
Conclusion: Two BP readings may be sufficient, unless the BP difference between the two readings was at least 10 mmHg for both systolic and diastolic.
Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
References
-
- Muntner P, Shimbo D, Carey RM, Charleston JB, Gaillard T, Misra S, et al. Measurement of blood pressure in humans: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Hypertension 2019; 73:e35–e66.
-
- Joint Committee for Guideline Revision. 2018 Chinese Guidelines for Prevention and Treatment of Hypertension-a report of the Revision Committee of Chinese Guidelines for Prevention and Treatment of Hypertension. J Geriatr Cardiol 2019; 16:182–241.
-
- Williams B, Mancia G, Spiering W, Agabiti Rosei E, Azizi M, Burnier M, et al. 2018 ESC/ESH Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension: the Task Force for the management of arterial hypertension of the European Society of Cardiology and the European Society of Hypertension. J Hypertens 2018; 36:1953–2041.
-
- Umemura S, Arima H, Arima S, Asayama K, Dohi Y, Hirooka Y, et al. The Japanese Society of Hypertension Guidelines for the Management of Hypertension (JSH 2019). Hypertens Res 2019; 42:1235–1481.
-
- Chen X, Xu SK, Guo QH, Hu Z, Wang HY, Yu J, et al. Barriers to blood pressure control in China in a large opportunistic screening. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) 2020; 22:835–841.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical