Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Dec 23;22(1):56.
doi: 10.1186/s10195-021-00614-7.

Antibiotic cement coating in orthopedic surgery: a systematic review of reported clinical techniques

Affiliations

Antibiotic cement coating in orthopedic surgery: a systematic review of reported clinical techniques

Abdullah Ismat et al. J Orthop Traumatol. .

Abstract

Background: Antibiotic-containing cement and bone graft substitute-coated orthopedic implants provide the advantages of simultaneous local antibiotic delivery and internal stable fixation, aiding in both infection eradication and osseous healing. Standardized protocols pertaining to implant coating techniques in various clinical and particularly intraoperative settings are scarce, and available literature is limited. This systematic review aims to provide a summary of the available current literature reporting on custom-made coating techniques of orthopedic implants, indications, outcomes, and associated complications in clinical use.

Methods: A systematic search of the literature in PubMed, Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases was performed in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Articles reporting specifically on custom-made coating techniques of orthopedic implants in a clinical setting were eligible.

Results: A total of 41 articles with a cumulative total number of 607 cases were included. Indications for treatment mostly involved intramedullary infections after previous plate osteosynthesis or nailing. A variety of implants ranging from intramedullary nails, plates, wires, and rods served as metal cores for coating. Polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) bone cement was most commonly used, with vancomycin as the most frequently added antibiotic additive. Chest tubes and silicone tubes were most often used to mold. Common complications are cement debonding and breakage of the metallic implant.

Conclusion: Adequate coating techniques can reduce the burden of treatment and be associated with favorable outcomes. Lack of general consensus and heterogeneity in the reported literature indicate that the perfect all-in-one implant coating method is yet to be found. Further efforts to improve implant coating techniques are warranted.

Level of evidence: III.

Keywords: Bone cement coating; Implant coating; Osteomyelitis; Osteosynthesis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
PRISMA flow diagram presenting the methodological approach for identification, screening, eligibility, and final inclusion of relevant articles

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Charnley J. Anchorage of the femoral head prosthesis to the shaft of the femur. J Bone Jt Surg Br. 1960;42-b:28–30. - PubMed
    1. Parvizi J, Saleh KJ, Ragland PS, Pour AE, Mont MA. Efficacy of antibiotic-impregnated cement in total hip replacement. Acta Orthop. 2008;79(3):335–341. - PubMed
    1. Buchholz HW, Engelbrecht H. Depot effects of various antibiotics mixed with Palacos resins. Chirurg. 1970;41(11):511–515. - PubMed
    1. Klemm K. Gentamicin-PMMA-beads in treating bone and soft tissue infections (author’s transl) Zentralbl Chir. 1979;104(14):934–942. - PubMed
    1. Kelm J, Bohrer P, Schmitt E, Anagnostakos K. Treatment of proximal femur infections with antibiotic-loaded cement spacers. Int J Med Sci. 2009;6(5):258–264. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types