Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2021 Dec 23;100(51):e28110.
doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000028110.

Development and validation of a prediction model for malignant pulmonary nodules: A cohort study

Affiliations
Observational Study

Development and validation of a prediction model for malignant pulmonary nodules: A cohort study

Zhen Ren et al. Medicine (Baltimore). .

Abstract

This study is to develop and validate a preoperative prediction model for malignancy of solitary pulmonary nodules. Data from 409 patients who underwent solitary pulmonary nodule resection at the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, China between June 2018 and December 2020 were retrospectively collected. Then, the patients were nonrandomly split into a training cohort and a validation cohort. Clinical features, imaging parameters and laboratory data were then collected. Logistic regression analysis was used to develop a prediction model to identify variables significantly associated with malignant pulmonary nodules (MPNs) that were then included in the nomogram. We evaluated the discrimination and calibration ability of the nomogram by concordance index and calibration plot, respectively. MPNs were confirmed in 215 (52.6%) patients by a pathological examination. Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified 6 risk factors independently associated with MPN: gender (female, odds ratio [OR] = 2.487; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.313-4.711; P = .005), location of nodule (upper lobe of lung, OR = 1.126; 95%CI: 1.054-1.204; P < .001), density of nodule (pure ground glass, OR = 4.899; 95%CI: 2.572-9.716; P < .001; part-solid nodules, OR = 6.096; 95%CI: 3.153-14.186; P < .001), nodule size (OR = 1.193; 95%CI: 1.107-1.290; P < .001), GAGE7 (OR = 1.954; 95%CI: 1.054-3.624; P = .033), and GBU4-5 (OR = 2.576; 95%CI: 1.380-4.806; P = .003). The concordance index was 0.86 (95%CI: 0.83-0.91) and 0.88 (95%CI: 0.84-0.94) in the training and validation cohorts, respectively. The calibration curves showed good agreement between the predicted risk by the nomogram and real outcomes. We have developed and validated a preoperative prediction model for MPNs. The model could aid physicians in clinical treatment decision making.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow chart of the study population. BPN = benign pulmonary nodule, MPN = malignant pulmonary nodule.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Nomogram for predicting MPN preoperatively in patients with PN. When using the nomogram, find the position of each variable on the axis and the corresponding point vertically. Then, add the points of all variables, and determine the prediction probability of MPN on the bottom axis. MPN = malignant pulmonary nodule.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Calibration curves of the clinical prediction model. A: Calibration plot for predicting MPN in the training cohort; B: calibration plot for predicting MPN in the validation cohort. C-index = concordance index, MPN = malignant pulmonary nodule.

References

    1. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 2021;71:209–49. - PubMed
    1. Horeweg N, van Rosmalen J, Heuvelmans MA, et al. Lung cancer probability in patients with CT-detected pulmonary nodules: a prespecified analysis of data from the NELSON trial of low-dose CT screening. Lancet Oncol 2014;15:1332–41. - PubMed
    1. Ost D, Fein AM, Feinsilver SH. Clinical practice. The solitary pulmonary nodule. N Engl J Med 2003;348:2535–42. - PubMed
    1. Bach PB, Mirkin JN, Oliver TK, et al. Benefits and harms of CT screening for lung cancer: a systematic review. JAMA 2012;307:2418–29. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Croswell JM, Baker SG, Marcus PM, et al. Cumulative incidence of false-positive test results in lung cancer screening: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med 2010;152:505–12. W176–80. - PubMed

Publication types