Effectiveness of microperimetry in evaluating anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy for diabetic macular edema patients with relatively good vision: A retrospective observational study
- PMID: 34941181
- PMCID: PMC8702257
- DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000028404
Effectiveness of microperimetry in evaluating anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy for diabetic macular edema patients with relatively good vision: A retrospective observational study
Abstract
No studies have evaluated the retinal sensitivity (RS) for diabetic macular edema (DME) patients with good vision. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the effectiveness of microperimetry in evaluating the effectiveness of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) treatment for DME patients with relatively good vision.Twenty-seven eyes of 27 patients (mean age, 61.3 ± 11.2 years) with DME and decimal best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) ≥0.6 were studied. All patients received 3 consecutive monthly injections of intravitreal anti-VEGF agents. The BCVA, central subfield macular thickness (CMT), and RS were evaluated by microperimetry (MAIA) within the 10 degree of the foveal center. To determine significant differences between the values, we used paired t tests.Patients were evaluated at baseline and 4 weeks after the third injection. The BCVA improved significantly from 0.18 ± 0.06 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) units to 0.13 ± 0.13 logMAR units (P = .002; paired t test). The CMT decreased significantly from 464.3 ± 91.8 μm to 393.4 ± 129.0 μm (P = .005), and the RS also improved significantly from 21.8 ± 3.1 dB to 24.1 ± 2.8 dB at 4 weeks after treatment (P = .006). Among the patients with a decimal BCVA of 0.7 or better at baseline, there was no significant improvement in the BCVA (P = .28). However, the CMT decreased significantly from 479.5 ± 79.1 μm to 394.0 ± 99.8 μm at 4 weeks after treatment (P = .007). The RS also improved significantly from 22.0 ± 2.4 dB to 24.0 ± 3.1 dB at 4 weeks after treatment (P = .004).Measuring RS by microperimetry is a good option for evaluating the effectiveness of anti-VEGF treatment for DME patients with a relatively good BCVA.
Copyright © 2021 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of Interest and Funding: MS received financial support from Alcon Pharma and Bayer and lecture fees from Alcon Pharma, Kowa Pharma, Senjyu Pharma, Daiichi Yakuhin Sangyo, Bayer, and Wakamoto Pharma; HM and MK received financial support from Alcon Pharma and Bayer; RM, KK, and YW declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Figures
References
-
- McMeel JW, Trempe CL, Franks EB. Diabetic maculopathy. Trans Sect Ophthalmol Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol 1977;83(3 pt 1):O476–87. - PubMed
-
- Moss SE, Klein R, Klein BEK. The incidence of visual loss in a diabetic population. Ophthalmology 1988;95:1340–8. - PubMed
-
- Haritoglou C, Kook D, Neubauer A, et al. Intravitreal bevacizumab (Avastin) therapy for persistent diffuse diabetic macular edema. Retina 2006;26:999–1005. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
