Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Dec 3;11(12):2263.
doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11122263.

The E-Textile for Biomedical Applications: A Systematic Review of Literature

Affiliations
Review

The E-Textile for Biomedical Applications: A Systematic Review of Literature

Giuseppe Cesarelli et al. Diagnostics (Basel). .

Abstract

The use of e-textile technologies spread out in the scientific research with several applications in both medical and nonmedical world. In particular, wearable technologies and miniature electronics devices were implemented and tested for medical research purposes. In this paper, a systematic review regarding the use of e-textile for clinical applications was conducted: the Scopus and Pubmed databases were investigate by considering research studies from 2010 to 2020. Overall, 262 papers were found, and 71 of them were included in the systematic review. Of the included studies, 63.4% focused on information and communication technology studies, while the other 36.6% focused on industrial bioengineering applications. Overall, 56.3% of the research was published as an article, while the remainder were conference papers. Papers included in the review were grouped by main aim into cardiological, muscular, physical medicine and orthopaedic, respiratory, and miscellaneous applications. The systematic review showed that there are several types of applications regarding e-textile in medicine and several devices were implemented as well; nevertheless, there is still a lack of validation studies on larger cohorts of subjects since the majority of the research only focuses on developing and testing the new device without considering a further extended validation.

Keywords: ECG; IMUs; biomedical engineering; diagnosis; e-textile; health monitoring; motion analysis; sEMG; smart garments; wearable.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow chart for selecting papers from Scopus and Pubmed databases.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Distribution of papers according to ICT and IB categories, conference papers, and articles.

References

    1. Jung Y., Kim S., Choi B. Consumer valuation of the wearables: The case of smartwatches. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2016;63:899–905. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2016.06.040. - DOI
    1. Stoppa M., Chiolerio A. Wearable electronics and smart textiles: A critical review. Sensors. 2014;14:11957–11992. doi: 10.3390/s140711957. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ghaffarzadeh K., Hayward J. Stretchable and conformable electronics: Heading toward market reality. Inf. Disp. 2017;33:28–31. doi: 10.1002/j.2637-496X.2017.tb01043.x. - DOI
    1. Majumder S., Mondal T., Deen M.J. Wearable sensors for remote health monitoring. Sensors. 2017;17:130. doi: 10.3390/s17010130. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Amitrano F., Donisi L., Coccia A., Biancardi A., Pagano G., D’Addio G. Experimental development and validation of an e-textile sock prototype; Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE International Symposium on Medical Measurements and Applications (MeMeA); Bari, Italy. 1 June–1 July 2020; pp. 1–5. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources