Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Dec 6;11(12):3471.
doi: 10.3390/ani11123471.

Phytogenic Feed Additives in Poultry: Achievements, Prospective and Challenges

Affiliations
Review

Phytogenic Feed Additives in Poultry: Achievements, Prospective and Challenges

Nedra Abdelli et al. Animals (Basel). .

Abstract

Phytogenic feed additives have been largely tested in poultry production with the aim to identify their effects on the gastrointestinal function and health, and their implications on the birds' systemic health and welfare, the production efficiency of flocks, food safety, and environmental impact. These feed additives originating from plants, and consisting of herbs, spices, fruit, and other plant parts, include many different bioactive ingredients. Reviewing published documents about the supplementation of phytogenic feed additives reveals contradictory results regarding their effectiveness in poultry production. This indicates that more effort is still needed to determine the appropriate inclusion levels and fully elucidate their mode of actions. In this frame, this review aimed to sum up the current trends in the use of phytogenic feed additives in poultry with a special focus on their interaction with gut ecosystem, gut function, in vivo oxidative status and immune system as well as other feed additives, especially organic acids.

Keywords: digestibility; immunity; microbiota; microencapsulation; organic acids; oxidant status; performance; phytogenics; poultry.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

    1. Ricke S.C., Dittoe D.K., Richardson K.E. Formic acid as an antimicrobial for poultry production: A review. Front. Vet. Sci. 2020;7:1–13. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2020.00563. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zhai H., Liu H., Wang S., Wu J., Kluenter A.M. Potential of essential oils for poultry and pigs. Anim. Nutr. 2018;4:179–186. doi: 10.1016/j.aninu.2018.01.005. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Al-Khalaifah H.S. Benefits of probiotics and/or prebiotics for antibiotic-reduced poultry. Poult. Sci. 2018;97:3807–3815. doi: 10.3382/ps/pey160. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ricke S.C., Richardson K., Dittoe D.K. Formaldehydes in feed and their potential interaction with the poultry gastrointestinal tract microbial community—A review. Front. Vet. Sci. 2019;6:1–11. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2019.00188. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Li M., Lin H., Jing Y., Wang J. Broad-host-range Salmonella bacteriophage STP4-a and its potential application evaluation in poultry industry. Poult. Sci. 2020;99:3643–3654. doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2020.03.051. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources