Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Dec 13;9(12):2580.
doi: 10.3390/microorganisms9122580.

Impact of Phage Therapy on Multidrug-Resistant Escherichia coli Intestinal Carriage in a Murine Model

Affiliations

Impact of Phage Therapy on Multidrug-Resistant Escherichia coli Intestinal Carriage in a Murine Model

François Javaudin et al. Microorganisms. .

Abstract

Introduction: The growing resistance of bacteria to antibiotics is a major global public health concern. An important reservoir of this resistance is the gut microbiota. However, limited data are available on the ability of phage therapy to reduce the digestive carriage of multidrug-resistant bacteria.

Materials and methods: Four novel lytic phages were isolated in vitro for efficacy against an extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing (ESBL) Escherichia coli strain also resistant to carbapenems through a carbapenemase OXA-48. The first step was to develop models of ESBL E. coli digestive carriage in mice. The second step was to test the efficacy of an oral and rectal phage therapy (a cocktail of four phages or microencapsulated phage) to reduce this carriage.

Results: The two most intense models of digestive carriage were obtained by administering amoxicillin (0.5 g·L-1) continuously in the drinking water (Model 1) or pantoprazole (0.1 g·L-1) continuously in the drinking water, combined with amoxicillin (0.5 g·L-1), for the first 8 days (Model 2). Oral administration of the phage cocktail to Model 1 resulted in a transient reduction in the concentration of ESBL E. coli in the faeces 9 days after the bacterial challenge (median = 5.33 × 108 versus 2.76 × 109 CFU·g-1, p = 0.02). In contrast, in Model 2, oral or oral + rectal administration of this cocktail did not alter the bacterial titre compared to the control (area under the curve, AUC, 3.49 × 109; 3.41 × 109 and 3.82 × 109 for the control, oral and oral + rectal groups, respectively; p-value > 0.8 for each two-by-two group comparison), as well as the administration of an oral microencapsulated phage in Model 1 (AUC = 8.93 × 109 versus 9.04 × 109, p = 0.81).

Conclusions: Oral treatment with amoxicillin promoted digestive carriage in mice, which was also the case for the addition of pantoprazole. However, our study confirms the difficulty of achieving efficacy with phage therapy to reduce multidrug-resistant bacterial digestive carriage in vivo.

Keywords: Escherichia coli; drug resistance; enterobacteriaceae; extended-spectrum beta-lactamase; intestinal carriage; multidrug-resistant bacteria; phage therapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Murine model of ESBL E. coli intestinal colonisation (6 mice per group) (A), Experimental protocol. (B), Faecal concentration of ESBL E. coli.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Experiment 1: oral cocktail of phages (A), Experimental protocol. (B), Faecal concentration of ESBL E. coli. Control group (n = 6), oral bacteriophages group (n = 6).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Experiment 2: microencapsulated phages (A), Experimental protocol. (B), Faecal concentration of ESBL E. coli. Control group (n = 4), oral microencapsulated phages group (n = 8).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Experiment 3: oral and rectal cocktail of phages with pantoprazole (A), Experimental protocol. (B), Faecal concentration of ESBL E. coli. Placebo group (n = 8), oral phages group (n = 8), oral and rectal phages group (n = 8).

References

    1. World Health Organization Global Priority List of Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria to Guide Researach, Discovery and Development of New Antibiotics. [(accessed on 7 November 2021)]. Available online: https://www.who.int/medicines/publications/WHO-PPL-Short_Summary_25Feb-E....
    1. Anthony W.E., Burnham C.-A.D., Dantas G., Kwon J.H. The gut microbiome as a reservoir for antimicrobial resistance. J. Infect. Dis. 2021;223:S209–S213. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiaa497. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Penders J., Stobberingh E.E., Savelkoul P.H.M., Wolffs P.F.G. The human microbiome as a reservoir of antimicrobial resistance. Front. Microbiol. 2013;4:87. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2013.00087. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sorbara M.T., Pamer E.G. Interbacterial mechanisms of colonization resistance and the strategies pathogens use to overcome them. Mucosal Immunol. 2019;12:1–9. doi: 10.1038/s41385-018-0053-0. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Schwaber M.J., Navon-Venezia S., Kaye K.S., Ben-Ami R., Schwartz D., Carmeli Y. Clinical and economic impact of bacteremia with extended- spectrum-beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2006;50:1257–1262. doi: 10.1128/AAC.50.4.1257-1262.2006. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Grants and funding

LinkOut - more resources