Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Dec 7;9(12):1696.
doi: 10.3390/healthcare9121696.

Emotional Intelligence Measures: A Systematic Review

Affiliations
Review

Emotional Intelligence Measures: A Systematic Review

Lluna María Bru-Luna et al. Healthcare (Basel). .

Abstract

Emotional intelligence (EI) refers to the ability to perceive, express, understand, and manage emotions. Current research indicates that it may protect against the emotional burden experienced in certain professions. This article aims to provide an updated systematic review of existing instruments to assess EI in professionals, focusing on the description of their characteristics as well as their psychometric properties (reliability and validity). A literature search was conducted in Web of Science (WoS). A total of 2761 items met the eligibility criteria, from which a total of 40 different instruments were extracted and analysed. Most were based on three main models (i.e., skill-based, trait-based, and mixed), which differ in the way they conceptualize and measure EI. All have been shown to have advantages and disadvantages inherent to the type of tool. The instruments reported in the largest number of studies are Emotional Quotient Inventory (EQ-i), Schutte Self Report-Inventory (SSRI), Mayer-Salovey-Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test 2.0 (MSCEIT 2.0), Trait Meta-Mood Scale (TMMS), Wong and Law's Emotional Intelligence Scale (WLEIS), and Trait Emotional Intelligence Questionnaire (TEIQue). The main measure of the estimated reliability has been internal consistency, and the construction of EI measures was predominantly based on linear modelling or classical test theory. The study has limitations: we only searched a single database, the impossibility of estimating inter-rater reliability, and non-compliance with some items required by PRISMA.

Keywords: emotional intelligence; measure; questionnaire; scale; systematic review; test.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart according to PRISMA.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Salovey P., Mayer J.D. Emotional Intelligence. Imagin. Cogn. Personal. 1990;9:185–211. doi: 10.2190/DUGG-P24E-52WK-6CDG. - DOI
    1. Mayer J.D., Roberts R.D., Barsade S.G. Human Abilities: Emotional Intelligence. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 2008;59:507–536. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093646. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mayer J., Caruso D., Salovey P. Selecting a measure of emotional intelligence: The case for ability scales. In: Bar-On R., Parker J., editors. The handbook of Emotional Intelligence: Theory, Development, Assessment, and Application at Home, School, and in the Workplace. Jossey-Bass; New York, NY, USA: 2000. pp. 320–342.
    1. Mayer J., Salovey P. What is emotional intelligence? In: Salovey P., Sluyter D.J., editors. Emotional Development and Emotional Intelligence: Implications for Educators. Basic Books; New York, NY, USA: 1997. pp. 3–31.
    1. Petrides K.V., Furnham A. Trait emotional intelligence: Psychometric investigation with reference to established trait taxonomies. Eur. J. Pers. 2001;15:425–448. doi: 10.1002/per.416. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources