Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Dec 16;14(24):7776.
doi: 10.3390/ma14247776.

Biocompatibility and Degradation Behavior of Molybdenum in an In Vivo Rat Model

Affiliations

Biocompatibility and Degradation Behavior of Molybdenum in an In Vivo Rat Model

Antje Schauer et al. Materials (Basel). .

Abstract

The biocompatibility and degradation behavior of pure molybdenum (Mo) as a bioresorbable metallic material (BMM) for implant applications were investigated. In vitro degradation of a commercially available Mo wire (ø250 µm) was examined after immersion in modified Kokubo's SBF for 28 days at 37 °C and pH 7.4. For assessment of in vivo degradation, the Mo wire was implanted into the abdominal aorta of female Wistar rats for 3, 6 and 12 months. Microstructure and corrosion behavior were analyzed by means of SEM/EDX analysis. After explantation, Mo levels in serum, urine, aortic vessel wall and organs were investigated via ICP-OES analysis. Furthermore, histological analyses of the liver, kidneys, spleen, brain and lungs were performed, as well as blood count and differentiation by FACS analysis. Levels of the C-reactive protein were measured in blood plasma of all the animals. In vitro and in vivo degradation behavior was very similar, with formation of uniform, non-passivating and dissolving product layers without occurrence of a localized corrosion attack. The in vitro degradation rate was 101.6 µg/(cm2·d) which corresponds to 33.6 µm/y after 28 days. The in vivo degradation rates of 12, 33 and 36 µg/(cm2·d) were observed after 3, 6 and 12 months for the samples properly implanted in the aortic vessel wall. This corresponds with a degradation rate of 13.5 µm/y for the 12-month cohort. However, the magnitude of degradation strongly depended on the implant site, with the wires incorporated into the vessel wall showing the most severe degradation. Degradation of the implanted Mo wire neither induced an increase in serum or urine Mo levels nor were elevated Mo levels found in the liver and kidneys compared with the respective controls. Only in the direct vicinity of the implant in the aortic vessel wall, a significant amount of Mo was found, which, however, was far below the amounts to be expected from degrading wires. No abnormalities were detected for all timepoints in histological and blood analyses compared to the control group. The C-reactive protein levels were similar between all the groups, indicating no inflammation processes. These findings suggest that dissolved Mo from a degrading implant is physiologically transported and excreted. Furthermore, radiographic and µCT analyses revealed excellent radiopacity of Mo in tissues. These findings and the unique combination with its extraordinary mechanical properties make Mo an interesting alternative for established BMMs.

Keywords: biocompatibility; bioresorbable; blood analysis; degradation; histologic analysis; in vivo; molybdenum; organ accumulation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Mo wire sample before and after implantation for 3 months (a) and the Mo wire implanted in a rat aorta (b). Image (c) shows a schematic drawing of the position of an implanted wire in the aortic vessel wall (1) and lumen (2) (schematic images copied from smart.servier.com, accessed on 16 November 2021).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Representative photographs of the Mo wire samples before and after 28 days of corrosion in c-SBF–Ca (a). Optical micrographs of the microstructure in the drawing direction (b) and of the cross-sectional view on the manufactured Mo wire (c). SEM images of uncorroded surface (d), cross-sectional view (e), and top-view (f) after 28 days of corrosion in c-SBF–Ca.
Figure 3
Figure 3
In vitro progression of the dissolution mass loss derived from ICP-OES measurements (a) and the dissolution rates (b) for the immersion of Mo wires for 28 days in c-SBF–Ca.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Radiograph of an implanted wire and a reference wire (a) and µCT images of the reference wire (b) and of the implanted wire in rat aortae (c).
Figure 5
Figure 5
Mo wires explanted from the abdominal rat aorta (a,d,g), sliced open aorta (view from within) (b,e,h) with indicated position of the cross-sectional view of the wires (c,f,i) after 12 months of implantation.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Representative cross-sectional (a,c,e) and top-view SEM images (b,d,f) of the Mo wires explanted from the abdominal rat aorta after 3, 6, and 12 months of implantation.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Blood analyses of the rats after 3, 6, or 12 months of Mo wire implantation compared to their age-matched controls. The bar charts represent the amount of red blood cells (RBC, a), white blood cells (WBC, b), and platelets (PLT, c). WBC were further analyzed for monocytes (d), lymphocytes (e), and neutrophil granulocytes (f); * p < 0.05; n = 6–14.
Figure 8
Figure 8
ICP-OES-derived tissue concentration of Mo in the aorta (implantation site), the kidneys, and the liver compared to the respective control organs of the age-matched animals (aorta: n3 months = 13, n6 months = 12, n12 months = 12; liver and kidneys, respectively: n3 months = 6, n6 months = 7, n12 months = 12; aorta, liver, and kidneys of the control animals: n = 6, respectively).
Figure 9
Figure 9
Representative histological imaging for the kidneys (Masson–Goldner staining) (a), liver (Azan staining) (b), each for the control group and the group with the implanted Mo wires for the 12 months timepoint. For the other timepoints and larger pictures, see the Supplementary Materials.

References

    1. Zheng Y.F., Gu X.N., Witte F. Biodegradable metals. Mater. Sci. Eng. R. 2014;77:1–34. doi: 10.1016/j.mser.2014.01.001. - DOI
    1. Redlich C., Schauer A., Scheibler J., Poehle G., Barthel P., Maennel A., Adams V., Weissgaerber T., Linke A., Quadbeck P. In Vitro Degradation Behavior and Biocompatibility of Bioresorbable Molybdenum. Metals. 2021;11:761. doi: 10.3390/met11050761. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wang J.-L., Xu J.-K., Hopkins C., Chow D.H.-K., Qin L. Biodegradable Magnesium-Based Implants in Orthopedics-A General Review and Perspectives. Adv. Sci. 2020;7:1902443. doi: 10.1002/advs.201902443. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Francis A., Yang Y., Virtanen S., Boccaccini A.R. Iron and iron-based alloys for temporary cardiovascular applications. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 2015;26:138. doi: 10.1007/s10856-015-5473-8. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Qi Y., Qi H., He Y., Lin W., Li P., Qin L., Hu Y., Chen L., Liu Q., Sun H., et al. Strategy of Metal-Polymer Composite Stent To Accelerate Biodegradation of Iron-Based Biomaterials. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2018;10:182–192. doi: 10.1021/acsami.7b15206. - DOI - PubMed