Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2021 Dec 12;18(24):13113.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph182413113.

Validity and Reliability of the Cardiac Rehabilitation Barriers Scale in the Czech Republic (CRBS-CZE): Determination of Key Barriers in East-Central Europe

Affiliations
Observational Study

Validity and Reliability of the Cardiac Rehabilitation Barriers Scale in the Czech Republic (CRBS-CZE): Determination of Key Barriers in East-Central Europe

Petr Winnige et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. .

Abstract

Cardiovascular rehabilitation (CR) is an effective secondary preventive model of care. However, the use of CR is insufficient, and the reasons for this are not well-characterized in East-Central Europe. This prospective observational study psychometrically validated the recently translated Cardiac Rehabilitation Barriers Scale for the Czech language (CRBS-CZE) and identified the main CR barriers. Consecutive cardiac in/out-patients were approached from January 2020 for 18 months, of whom 186 (89.9%) consented. In addition to sociodemographic characteristics, participants completed the 21-item CRBS-CZE (response options 1-5, with higher scores representing greater barriers), and their CR utilization was tracked. Forty-five (24.2%) participants enrolled in CR, of whom 42 completed the CRBS a second time thereafter. Factor analysis revealed four factors, consistent with other CRBS translations. Internal reliability was acceptable for all but one factor (Cronbach's alpha range = 0.44-0.77). Mean total barrier scores were significantly higher in non-enrollers (p < 0.001), decreased from first and second administration in these enrollers (p < 0.001), and were lower in CR completers (p < 0.001), supporting criterion validity. There were also significant differences in barrier scores by education, geography, tobacco use, among other variables, further supporting validity. The biggest barriers to enrolment were distance, work responsibilities, lack of time, transportation problems, and comorbidities; and the greatest barriers to adherence were distance and travel. Several items were considered irrelevant at first and second administration. Other barriers included wearing a mask during the COVID-19 pandemic. The study demonstrated sufficient validity and reliability of CRBS-CZE, which supports its use in future research.

Keywords: Czech Republic; barriers; cardiac rehabilitation; coronary artery disease; utilization.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart of the study.

References

    1. World Health Organization Noncommunicable Diseases Country Profiles. 2018. [(accessed on 30 January 2021)]. Available online: https://www.who.int/nmh/publications/ncd-profiles-2018/en/
    1. Ústav Zdravotnických Informací a Statistiky ČR Zdravotnická Ročenka České Republiky. 2018. [(accessed on 30 January 2021)]. Available online: https://www.uzis.cz/res/f/008280/zdrroccz-2018.pdf.
    1. Český Statistický Úřad Výsledky Zdravotnických Účtů ČR 2010–2018. [(accessed on 30 January 2021)]. Available online: https://www.czso.cz/documents/10180/122362658/26000520.pdf/ce8cd21a-9317....
    1. World Health Organization Cardiovascular Diseases. [(accessed on 30 January 2021)]. Available online: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/cardiovascular-diseases...
    1. Anderson L., Oldridge N., Thompson D.R., Zwisler A., Rees K., Martin N., Taylor R.S. Exercise-Based Cardiac Rehabilitation for Coronary Heart Disease Cochrane Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2016;67:1–12. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.10.044. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types