Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2023 Jan;37(1):163-169.
doi: 10.1038/s41433-021-01886-3. Epub 2021 Dec 23.

Intravitreal injections as a leading cause of acute postoperative endophthalmitis-a regional survey in England

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Intravitreal injections as a leading cause of acute postoperative endophthalmitis-a regional survey in England

Ariel Yuhan Ong et al. Eye (Lond). 2023 Jan.

Abstract

Background: To evaluate the characteristics, treatment patterns and outcomes of acute postoperative endophthalmitis.

Methods: Patients presenting with acute postoperative endophthalmitis between January 2017 to December 2019 were identified from hospital records in this multicentre retrospective cohort study. Clinical records were reviewed for visual acuity (VA) at various timepoints, cause of endophthalmitis, microbiological results, treatments and complications.

Results: Forty-six eyes of 46 patients were included. Intravitreal injections were the leading cause of acute postoperative endophthalmitis (n = 29; 63%), followed by cataract surgery (n = 8; 17%), vitreoretinal surgery (n = 7; 15%), and secondary intraocular lens insertion (n = 2, 4%). The absolute risk of endophthalmitis was 0.024% (1:4132) for intravitreal injections, 0.016% (1:6096) for cataract surgery, and 0.072% (1:1385) for vitreoretinal surgery. The majority of patients (n = 38; 83%) had better VA at 6 months compared to presentation, although fewer (n = 13; 28%) maintained similar or better VA compared to before the precipitating surgery. Twenty-four cases yielded positive culture results, of which staphylococcus epidermidis was the most commonly isolated organism. Microbiological yield was not associated with better final visual outcomes. Patients who underwent therapeutic vitrectomy (n = 15; 33%) had poorer VA at presentation, but subsequently achieved visual outcomes comparable to those who received medical treatment alone. There was no difference in time to presentation, visual outcome and retinal detachment rates among the different causative procedures.

Conclusion: Intravitreal injections were the most common cause of endophthalmitis in our region, primarily because of their higher frequency compared to other intraocular procedures. In this cohort, the primary procedure had no effect on presentation, management or visual outcomes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Graphical representation of causes, time to presentation, and visual acuity data for endophthalmitis cases.
A Distribution of endophthalmitis cases by primary causative procedure. B Distribution of time from intraocular procedure to presentation, classified by primary causative procedure. C Distribution of visual acuity across all cases, then separately by primary causative procedure. D Scatter plot of visual acuity at baseline compared to follow-up at 6 months. E Scatter plot of visual acuity at presentation compared to follow-up at 6 months. B, Baseline; P, Presenting; F, Final.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Visual acuity measurements by microbiological yield, at presentation and at final follow-up.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Visual acuity measurements by therapeutic vitrectomy, at presentation and at final follow-up.

References

    1. Kiss S, Dugel PU, Khanani AM, Broder MS, Chang E, Sun GH, et al. Endophthalmitis rates among patients receiving intravitreal anti-VEGF injections: a USA claims analysis. Clin Ophthalmol. 2018;12:1625–35. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S169143. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Taban M, Behrens A, Newcomb RL, Nobe MY, Saedi G, Sweet PM, et al. Acute endophthalmitis following cataract surgery: a systematic review of the literature. Arch Ophthalmol. 2005;123:613–20. doi: 10.1001/archopht.123.5.613. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Li T, Sun J, Min J, Zhou S, Zhu X, Jia H, et al. Safety of receiving anti–vascular endothelial growth factor intravitreal injection in office-based vs operating room settings: a meta-analysis. JAMA Ophthalmol [Internet]. 2021. 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2021.3096. Accesssed 5 Sep 2021. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Day AC, Donachie PHJ, Sparrow JM, Johnston RL. The Royal College of Ophthalmologists’ National Ophthalmology Database study of cataract surgery: report 1, visual outcomes and complications. Eye. 2015;29:552–60. doi: 10.1038/eye.2015.3. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Barry P, Cordovés L, Gardner S. ESCRS guidelines for prevention and treatment of endophthalmitis following cataract surgery: data, dilemmas and conclusions [Internet]. ESCRS; 2013. https://www.escrs.org/downloads/Endophthalmitis-Guidelines.pdf. Accessed 20 Nov 2020.

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances