Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Sep 21;10(6):545-560.
doi: 10.1159/000518104. eCollection 2021 Nov.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: The Emerging Cornerstone in Cholangiocarcinoma Therapy?

Affiliations
Review

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: The Emerging Cornerstone in Cholangiocarcinoma Therapy?

María Gutiérrez-Larrañaga et al. Liver Cancer. .

Abstract

Background: Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) encompasses a heterogeneous group of malignant tumors with dismal prognosis and increasing incidence worldwide. Both late diagnosis due to the lack of early symptoms and the refractory nature of these tumors seriously compromise patients' welfare and outcomes.

Summary: During the last decade, immunotherapy and, more specifically, modulation of immune checkpoints-mediated signaling pathways have been under the spotlight in the field of oncology, emerging as a potential therapeutic approach for the treatment of several cancers, including CCA. Generally, high expression levels of immune checkpoints in patients with CCA have been associated with worse clinical outcomes, particularly with shorter overall survival and relapse-free survival. Thus, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), which mainly constitute different monoclonal antibodies, have been developed in order to hamper the immune checkpoint-mediated pathways. Interestingly, chemotherapy may increase the expression of immune checkpoints, while other therapeutic approaches such as ablative and targeted therapies may enhance their antitumor activity. In this sense, several clinical trials evaluated the safety and efficacy of ICIs for CCA, both as a monotherapy and in combination with other ICIs or loco-regional and systemic therapies. Additionally, many other clinical trials are currently ongoing and results are eagerly awaited. Here, we summarize the key aspects of immune checkpoint molecules as prognostic factors and therapeutic targets in CCA, highlighting the most recent advances in the field and future research directions.

Key messages: (1) Effective therapeutic approaches for CCA are urgently needed. (2) Expression levels of immune checkpoints in patients with CCA have been proposed to be related with clinical outcomes. (3) Combination of different ICIs may outperform the efficacy of ICI monotherapy for CCA treatment. (4) Recent studies point toward the combination of ICIs and other common therapies, especially chemotherapy, as a promising strategy for treatment of CCA patients.

Keywords: Cholangiocarcinoma; Clinical trials; Immune checkpoint inhibitors; Prognosis; Therapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Interactions and therapeutic targeting of immune checkpoints in CCA. Schematic representation showing the co-inhibitory (red) and co-stimulatory (green) immune checkpoint pathways studied in CCA and main cell interactions implicated in their signaling. In addition, drugs targeting these immune checkpoints, which have been studied in CCA, are indicated in the figure. APC, antigen-presenting cell; CCAc, cholangiocarcinoma cell; CD28, cluster of differentiation 28; CD40, cluster of differentiation 40; CD40L, CD40 ligand; CD80, cluster of differentiation 80; CTLA4, cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4; HHLA2, human endogenous retrovirus-H long terminal repeat-associating protein 2; GITR, glucocorticoid-induced tumor necrosis factor receptor-related protein; GITRL, GITR ligand; KIR3DL3, killer cell immunoglobulin-like receptor, 3 immunoglobulin domains and long cytoplasmic tail 3; PD-1, programmed death 1; PD-L1, programmed death-ligand 1; TAM, tumor-associated macrophage; TGF β, transforming growth factor β; TIL, tumor-infiltrating T lymphocyte; Treg, regulatory T cell. Created with BioRender.com.

References

    1. Rodrigues PM, Olaizola P, Paiva NA, Olaizola I, Agirre-Lizaso A, Landa A, et al. Pathogenesis of cholangiocarcinoma. Annu Rev Pathol. 2021 Jan 24;16:433–63. - PubMed
    1. Khan SA, Tavolari S, Brandi G. Cholangiocarcinoma: epidemiology and risk factors. Liver Int. 2019 May;39((Suppl 1)):19–31. - PubMed
    1. Bertuccio P, Malvezzi M, Carioli G, Hashim D, Boffetta P, El-Serag HB, et al. Global trends in mortality from intrahepatic and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. J Hepatol. 2019 Jul;71((1)):104–14. - PubMed
    1. Massironi S, Pilla L, Elvevi A, Longarini R, Rossi RE, Bidoli P, et al. New and emerging systemic therapeutic options for advanced cholangiocarcinoma. Cells. 2020 Mar 11;9((3)):688. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bridgewater J, Galle PR, Khan SA, Llovet JM, Park JW, Patel T, et al. Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. J Hepatol. 2014 Jun;60((6)):1268–89. - PubMed